Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Skew Distributions and the Sizes of Business Firms
This map shows the geographic impact of Lars Engwall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lars Engwall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lars Engwall more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lars Engwall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lars Engwall. The network helps show where Lars Engwall may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lars Engwall
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lars Engwall.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lars Engwall based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Lars Engwall. Lars Engwall is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Engwall, Lars. (2013). Academic Taxi Drivers in Global Markets. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 1(3). 25–27.2 indexed citations
3.
Engwall, Lars. (2013). Universitet under uppsikt. 19–34.2 indexed citations
4.
Engwall, Lars. (2012). A Decade of Exploration. 1(1). 9–11.
5.
Engwall, Lars, Matthias Kipping, & Behlül Üsdiken. (2010). Public science systems, higher education and the trajectory of academic disciplines: business studies in the United States and Europe. Sabanci University. 325–353.9 indexed citations
6.
Engwall, Lars, Matthias Kipping, & Behlül Üsdiken. (2008). The transfer of management knowledge to peripheral countries. International Studies of Management and Organization. 38(4). 3–16.9 indexed citations
7.
Engwall, Lars. (2008). The University : a Multinational Corporation?. 9–21.11 indexed citations
8.
Engwall, Lars, et al.. (2004). The Dissemination of Management Knowledge. CentAUR (University of Reading).6 indexed citations
9.
Engwall, Lars & Kerstin Sahlin‐Andersson. (2003). Expansion of Management Knowledge: Carriers, Flows, and Sources. Stanford University Press eBooks. 392–392.245 indexed citations
10.
Sahlin‐Andersson, Kerstin & Lars Engwall. (2002). Carriers, Flows and Sources of Management Knowledge. 3–32.65 indexed citations
11.
Engwall, Lars. (2000). The Globalisation of Management. Standardisation Processes in Management with an Illustration from Scandinavia. 70(1). 1–22.1 indexed citations
12.
Engwall, Lars, et al.. (1996). Styrelsens ansvar i banker.
Engwall, Lars. (1985). Ägar- och ledningsformers betydelse för den socialdemokratiska pressens utveckling. 88(3). 269–274.1 indexed citations
17.
Engwall, Lars & Jan Johanson. (1980). Some Aspects of Control in International Business. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis eBooks.4 indexed citations
18.
Engwall, Lars. (1978). Berg, Per-Olof, Emotional Structures in Organizations: A Study of the Process of Change in a Swedish Company, Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1979, doktoravhandling, xii+2B7 ss.. 43.4 indexed citations
19.
Engwall, Lars. (1976). Travels in Newspaper Country..1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.