Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse
2010593 citationsJochen Gläser, Grit LaudelVS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooksprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of Jochen Gläser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jochen Gläser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jochen Gläser more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jochen Gläser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jochen Gläser. The network helps show where Jochen Gläser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jochen Gläser
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jochen Gläser.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jochen Gläser based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jochen Gläser. Jochen Gläser is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gläser, Jochen, et al.. (2019). Persistent Problems for a Bibliometrics of Social Sciences and Humanities and How to Overcome Them.. ISSI. 1056–1067.3 indexed citations
5.
Gläser, Jochen, et al.. (2018). Changing funding arrangements and the production of scientific knowledge. Springer eBooks. 56(1).2 indexed citations
6.
Gläser, Jochen. (2018). Accounting for field-specific research practices in surveys. Leiden Repository (Leiden University). 1364–1370.1 indexed citations
7.
Gläser, Jochen, Wolfgang Glänzel, & Andrea Scharnhorst. (2017). Same data—different results? Towards a comparative approach to the identification of thematic structures in science: Introduction to the special issue. Scientometrics. 111(2).3 indexed citations
8.
Gläser, Jochen, et al.. (2017). Journals as Communication Channels between National Sub-Communities.. ISSI. 1477–1488.2 indexed citations
9.
Gläser, Jochen, Michael G. Heinz, & Frank Havemann. (2015). Epistemic Diversity as Distribution of Paper Dissimilarities.. ISSI.3 indexed citations
10.
Havemann, Frank, Jochen Gläser, & Michael G. Heinz. (2015). A Link-based Memetic Algorithm for Reconstructing Overlapping Topics from Networks of Papers and their Cited Sources.. ISSI.2 indexed citations
Glänzel, Wolfgang, Jochen Gläser, Ismael Ràfols, & Paul Wouters. (2013). Individual-level evaluative bibliometrics - the politics of its use and abuse. DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)).3 indexed citations
Gläser, Jochen. (2006). Wissenschaftliche Produktionsgemeinschaften: die soziale ordnung der forschung [Scientific Production Communities. The Social Order of Research]. Campus Verlag eBooks.17 indexed citations
15.
Strübing, Jörg, et al.. (2004). Kooperation im Niemandsland. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks.4 indexed citations
Gläser, Jochen & Grit Laudel. (2000). Re-analysis as a Comparison of Constructions. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.2 indexed citations
19.
Gläser, Jochen, et al.. (1996). Anwendungsorientierung von Grundlagenforschung? Erfahrungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR. Econstor (Econstor). 25.4 indexed citations
20.
Gläser, Jochen. (1995). Zur Anwendungsorientierung von Grundlagenforschung: Erfahrungen der AdW der DDR. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 623–628.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.