Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments
This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Johanson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Johanson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Johanson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Johanson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Johanson. The network helps show where Jan Johanson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan Johanson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan Johanson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan Johanson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jan Johanson. Jan Johanson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lee, Joong-Woo, et al.. (2006). Business Network Learning and Commitment in Foreign Market Entry : Samsung Electronics Enters the British Market. 17(3). 57–95.1 indexed citations
4.
Mattsson, Lars‐Gunnar & Jan Johanson. (2006). Discovering market networks. European Journal of Marketing. 40(3/4). 259–274.64 indexed citations
5.
Forsgren, Mats, Ulf Holm, & Jan Johanson. (2005). Managing the Embedded Multinational. Books.31 indexed citations
6.
Håkansson, Håkan & Jan Johanson. (2001). Business network learning. Pergamon eBooks.61 indexed citations
7.
Eriksson, Kent, Jan Johanson, Anders Majkgård, & D. Deo Sharma. (2001). Time and experience in the internationalization process. 71(1). 21–44.30 indexed citations
8.
Andersson, Mats R., Chr. Bargholtz, H. Calén, et al.. (2000). The Exclusive p + d → 3 {He} + 2π Reaction at CELSIUS. Acta Physica Polonica B. 31(10). 2123.1 indexed citations
Andersson, Ulf, Jan Johanson, & Jan‐Erik Vahlne. (1998). Organic Acquisitions in the Internationalization Process of the Business Firm. Management International Review. 37(2). 67–84.48 indexed citations
12.
Johanson, Jan. (1998). Two pion production in proton proton collisions near threshold at CELSIUS. Prepared for. 31–34.
13.
Holm, Desirée Blankenburg & Jan Johanson. (1997). Business Network Connections and the Atmosphere of International Business Relationships. 411–432.7 indexed citations
14.
Håkansson, Håkan & Jan Johanson. (1993). The Network as a Governance Structure: Interfirm Cooperation Beyond Markets and Hierarchies. 35–51.150 indexed citations
15.
Håkansson, Håkan & Jan Johanson. (1992). A Model of Industrial Networks. 28–34.381 indexed citations
Hallén, Lars & Jan Johanson. (1989). Networks of relationships in international industrial marketing. JAI Press eBooks.14 indexed citations
19.
Johanson, Jan, et al.. (1982). Företag i nätverk : ny syn på konkurrenskraft.29 indexed citations
20.
Engwall, Lars & Jan Johanson. (1980). Some Aspects of Control in International Business. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis eBooks.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.