Lanny Fields

2.7k citations
81 papers · 2.2k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Lanny Fields

79 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Lanny Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 2.0k
  • Statistics and Probability 934
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.2k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 149
  • Small Animals 58
Replace William J. McIlvane with:
William J. McIlvane United States
William V. Dube United States
Erik Arntzen Norway
Paul M. Smeets Netherlands
Dermot Barnes Ireland
Lawrence T. Stoddard United States
Charles P. Shimp United States
Peter Harzem United States
David C. Palmer United States
Kenneth F. Reeve United States
Lanny Fields relative to William J. McIlvane United States William J. McIlvane's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
William J. McIlvane · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lanny Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lanny Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lanny Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lanny Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lanny Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lanny Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lanny Fields. The network helps show where Lanny Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Lanny Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lanny Fields Line = papers co-authored together Lanny Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987178
2 1990149
3 1984123
4 1995102
5 201285
6 199376
7 199770
8 199167
9 200962
10 199961
11 199757
12 199351
13 200746
14 200142
15 199537
16 201134
17 199732
18 201432
19 199232
20 201431

About Lanny Fields

Lanny Fields is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability, Cognitive Neuroscience, Food Science and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 81 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (77 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (36 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (29 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (12 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (7 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (5 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (5 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (2.0k citations), Statistics and Probability (934 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.2k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (149 citations) and Small Animals (58 citations). Lanny Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include Thom Verhave, Barbara J. Adams, Erik Arntzen, Kenneth F. Reeve, Sandra J. Newman, Dawn M. Buffington, James Belanich, Antonios Varelas, Peter Sturmey and Ronald Lee. Their work appears in journals such as The Psychological Record, Learning & Behavior, Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis and Journal of Organizational Behavior Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact