Countries citing papers authored by Paul M. Smeets
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul M. Smeets's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul M. Smeets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul M. Smeets more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul M. Smeets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul M. Smeets. The network helps show where Paul M. Smeets may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul M. Smeets
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul M. Smeets.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul M. Smeets based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Paul M. Smeets. Paul M. Smeets is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Smeets, Paul M., et al.. (2012). Equivalence-Equivalence as a Model of Analogy: Further Analyses. MURAL - Maynooth University Research Archive Library (National University of Ireland, Maynooth).16 indexed citations
Smeets, Paul M., et al.. (2005). Igualación de muestras compuestas con comparaciones sencillas: la intercambiabilidad de los términos estimulares. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología. 37(2). 317–331.2 indexed citations
4.
Barnes‐Holmes, Yvonne, Dermot Barnes‐Holmes, & Paul M. Smeets. (2004). Establishing Relational Responding in Accordance with Opposite as Generalized Operant Behavior in Young Children. Revista internacional de psicología y terapia psicológica. 4(3). 559–586.43 indexed citations
5.
Barnes‐Holmes, Yvonne, Yvonne Barnes‐Holmes, Paul M. Smeets, Paul S. Strand, & Patrick C. Friman. (2004). Establecimiento en niños pequeños de comportamiento relacional de acuerdo a más-qué y menos-qué como conducta operante generalizada.. Revista internacional de psicología y terapia psicológica.2 indexed citations
6.
Barnes‐Holmes, Dermot, Yvonne Barnes‐Holmes, Robert Whelan, et al.. (2004). Interfacing Relational Frame Theory with Cognitive Neuroscience: Semantic Priming, The Implicit Association Test, and Event Related Potentials. Revista internacional de psicología y terapia psicológica. 4(2). 215–240.18 indexed citations
7.
Barnes‐Holmes, Yvonne, Dermot Barnes‐Holmes, Paul M. Smeets, Paul S. Strand, & Patrick C. Friman. (2004). Establishing Relational Responding in Accordance with More-than and Less-than as Generalized Operant Behavior in Young Children. Revista internacional de psicología y terapia psicológica. 4(3). 531–558.78 indexed citations
8.
Barnes‐Holmes, Yvonne, Yvonne Barnes‐Holmes, & Paul M. Smeets. (2004). Establecer Responder Relacional de acuerdo con frente a la Conducta como Generalizada de Operant en Niños Jóvenes.. Revista internacional de psicología y terapia psicológica.1 indexed citations
9.
Smeets, Paul M., et al.. (2003). Reversal of Equivalence Relations. The Psychological Record. 53(1). 91–119.18 indexed citations
10.
Barnes‐Holmes, Yvonne, Dermot Barnes‐Holmes, Bryan Roche, & Paul M. Smeets. (2001). Exemplar Training and a Derived Transformation of Function in Accordance with Symmetry: II. The Psychological Record. 51(4). 6.46 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.