The Psychological Record

2.8k papers and 38.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.8k papers published in The Psychological Record in the last decades have received a total of 38.3k indexed citations. Papers published in The Psychological Record usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.4k papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (831 papers) and Social Psychology (478 papers) specifically the topics of Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1.2k papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (462 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (267 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Psychological Record are Yvonne Barnes‐Holmes, Adam Smith, Dermot Barnes‐Holmes, Robert Whelan, Dermot Barnes, Charles E. Rice, Erik Arntzen, Gordon G. Gallup, William Stephenson and Bryan Roche.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Psychological Record

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Psychological Record. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Psychological Record.

Countries where authors publish in The Psychological Record

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Psychological Record. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Psychological Record with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Psychological Record more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025