Kyle Smith
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Pharmacy top 10%
- Infant Health and Development
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 2
-
- Memory Processes and Influences 1
- Co-authors
- Carolyn Zahn‐Waxler (2 shared papers)Pamela M. Cole (2 shared papers)Elizabeth F. Loftus (2 shared papers)Mark R. Klinger (2 shared papers)Lynn Sheridan (1 shared paper)Humberto Silva (2 shared papers)Dennis Alonzo (1 shared paper)Elisabeth Duursma (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Developmental Psychology (2 papers)Public Opinion Quarterly (1 paper)Teachers and Teaching (1 paper)OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaGhana
In The Last Decade
Kyle Smith
7 papers receiving 297 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Clinical Psychology 206
- Pharmacy 28
- Social Psychology 115
- Education 105
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 37
Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Smith. The network helps show where Kyle Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Kyle Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1994 | 224 | |
| 2 | Memory and mismemory for health events. | 1992 | 49 |
| 3 | 1990 | 40 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2025 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 1 |
About Kyle Smith
Kyle Smith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 7 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (2 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper), Emotional Labor in Professions (1 paper), Memory Processes and Influences (1 paper), Employment and Welfare Studies (1 paper) and Building Energy and Comfort Optimization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (206 citations), Pharmacy (28 citations), Social Psychology (115 citations), Education (105 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (37 citations). Kyle Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Carolyn Zahn‐Waxler, Pamela M. Cole, Elizabeth F. Loftus, Mark R. Klinger, Lynn Sheridan, Humberto Silva, Dennis Alonzo, Elisabeth Duursma and Brantley Mills. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Psychology, Public Opinion Quarterly, Teachers and Teaching and OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.