Kyle Rozema
Impact in
- Law top 2%
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
- Legal and Constitutional Studies
- Taxation and Compliance Studies
Papers in
- Law 23
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies 17
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations 14
-
- Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems 26
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth 7
- Legal and Constitutional Studies 6
- Taxation and Compliance Studies 5
- Co-authors
- Max M. SchanzenbachAdam ChiltonMaya SenAdam BonicaJacob GoldinChristopher Anthony CotropiaNicolas R. ZiebarthAlex Rees-Jones
- Journals
- American Law and Economics Review (3 papers)Journal of Empirical Legal Studies (3 papers)The Journal of Legal Studies (2 papers)The Journal of Law and Economics (2 papers)National Tax Journal (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPhilippinesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Kyle Rozema
40 papers receiving 203 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Law 79
- Economics and Econometrics 115
- Gender Studies 28
- Political Science and International Relations 59
- Pharmacy 10
Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Rozema
This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Rozema's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Rozema with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Rozema more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Rozema
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Rozema. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Rozema. The network helps show where Kyle Rozema may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Kyle Rozema, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 1 |
About Kyle Rozema
Kyle Rozema is a scholar working on Law, Economics and Econometrics, Accounting, Gender Studies and Pharmacy, having authored 44 papers that have together received 217 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (26 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (17 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (14 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (7 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (6 papers), Taxation and Compliance Studies (5 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (4 papers) and Artificial Intelligence in Law (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (79 citations), Economics and Econometrics (115 citations), Gender Studies (28 citations), Political Science and International Relations (59 citations) and Pharmacy (10 citations). Kyle Rozema has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Philippines and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Max M. Schanzenbach, Adam Chilton, Maya Sen, Adam Bonica, Jacob Goldin, Christopher Anthony Cotropia, Nicolas R. Ziebarth, Alex Rees-Jones, Jonathan S. Masur and Tonja Jacobi. Their work appears in journals such as American Law and Economics Review, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, The Journal of Legal Studies, The Journal of Law and Economics and National Tax Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.