This map shows the geographic impact of Tonja Jacobi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tonja Jacobi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tonja Jacobi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tonja Jacobi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tonja Jacobi. The network helps show where Tonja Jacobi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tonja Jacobi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tonja Jacobi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tonja Jacobi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tonja Jacobi. Tonja Jacobi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jacobi, Tonja, et al.. (2018). The New Oral Argument: Justices as Advocates. The Notre Dame law review. 94(3). 1161.4 indexed citations
6.
Jacobi, Tonja, et al.. (2017). Justice, Interrupted: The Effect of Gender, Ideology and Seniority at Supreme Court Oral Arguments. Virginia Law Review. 103(7). 1379–1496.19 indexed citations
7.
Fischman, Joshua B. & Tonja Jacobi. (2016). The Second Dimension of the Supreme Court. William and Mary law review. 57(5). 1671–1716.5 indexed citations
8.
Jacobi, Tonja, et al.. (2015). Creating a Self-Stabilizing Constitution: The Role of the Takings Clause. Northwestern University law review. 109(3). 601–638.6 indexed citations
9.
Jacobi, Tonja. (2013). Obamacare as a Window on Judicial Strategy. 80.1 indexed citations
10.
Jacobi, Tonja. (2011). The Law and Economics of the Exclusionary Rule. The Notre Dame law review. 87(2). 585–675.5 indexed citations
Baird, Vanessa A. & Tonja Jacobi. (2009). How the Dissent Becomes the Majority: Using Federalism to Transform Coalitions in the U.S. Supreme Court. Duke Law Journal. 59(2). 183–238.8 indexed citations
13.
Jacobi, Tonja, et al.. (2009). Taking the Measure of Ideology: Empirically Measuring Supreme Court Cases. The Georgetown law journal. 98(1). 1–75.3 indexed citations
14.
Baird, Vanessa A. & Tonja Jacobi. (2009). Judicial Agenda Setting Through Signaling and Strategic Litigant Responses. Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis). 29(1). 215–239.6 indexed citations
15.
Jacobi, Tonja. (2008). The Judicial Signaling Game: How Judges Strategically Shape Their Dockets. 16. 1–38.2 indexed citations
Jacobi, Tonja & Emerson H. Tiller. (2007). Legal Doctrine and Political Control. The Journal of Law Economics and Organization. 23(2). 326–345.35 indexed citations
18.
Jacobi, Tonja, et al.. (2007). Acknowledging guilt: Forcing self-identification in post-conviction DNA testing. eYLS (Yale Law School). 102(1). 263–306.1 indexed citations
19.
Jacobi, Tonja, et al.. (2006). The Subtle Unraveling of Federalism: The Illogic of Using State Legislation as Evidence of an Evolving National Consensus. North Carolina law review. 84(4). 1089–1158.3 indexed citations
20.
Jacobi, Tonja. (2006). The Impact of Positive Political Theory on Old Questions of Constitutional Law and the Separation of Powers. Northwestern University law review. 100(1). 259–278.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.