The Journal of Legal Studies
About
In The Last Decade
The Journal of Legal Studies
1.0k papers receiving 28.6k citations
Fields of papers published in The Journal of Legal Studies
This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of Legal Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of Legal Studies.
Countries where authors publish in The Journal of Legal Studies
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of Legal Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of Legal Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of Legal Studies more than expected).
- Law Enforcement, Malfeasance, and Compensation of Enforcers (1974)
- Crime, Deterrence, and Right‐to‐Carry Concealed Handguns (1997)
- Explaining Deviations from the Fifty-Percent Rule: A Multimodal Approach to the Selection of Cases for Litigation (1996)
- Why Is the Common Law Efficient? (1977)
- Sequential versus Unitary Trials: An Economic Analysis (1993)
- The Common Law Process and the Selection of Efficient Rules (1977)
- Copyright Protection of Letters, Diaries, and Other Unpublished Works: An Economic Approach (1992)
- The Economics of Legal Conflicts (1973)
- The Law and Economics of Public Policy: A Plea to the Scholars (1972)
- A Critique of Economic and Sociological Theories of Social Control (1987)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.