Adam Bonica
- Law top 0.2%
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies 24
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations 10
-
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation 22
- Social Policy and Reform Studies 5
- Strategy and Management top 2%
- Political Influence and Corporate Strategies 13
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Public Administration top 5%
-
- Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems 19
- Legal and Constitutional Studies 11
-
- Media Influence and Politics 7
- Co-authors
- Howard L. RosenthalMaya SenKeith T. PooleNolan McCartyMichael J. WoodruffAdam ChiltonDavid J. RothmanKyle Rozema
- Partner nations
- United StatesPhilippinesRussia
In The Last Decade
Adam Bonica
52 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Law 381
- Political Science and International Relations 901
- Strategy and Management 485
- Gender Studies 272
- Public Administration 90
Countries citing papers authored by Adam Bonica
This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Bonica's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Bonica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Bonica more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Bonica
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Bonica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Bonica. The network helps show where Adam Bonica may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Adam Bonica, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 9 | Judicial Reform as a Tug of War: How Ideological Differences Between Politicians and the Bar Explain Attempts at Judicial Reform | 2017 | 1 |
| 10 | 2017 | 25 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 83 | |
| 12 | The Political Ideologies of American Lawyers | 2016 | 47 |
| 13 | 2015 | 34 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 28 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 59 | |
| 17 | Breaching the Biennial Limit: Why the FEC Has Failed to Enforce Aggregate Hard-Money Limits and How Record Linkage Technology Can Help | 2013 | 2 |
| 18 | Estimating Bureaucratic Ideal Points from Campaign Contributions | 2012 | 2 |
| 19 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 20 | Small Donors, Special Interests and Polarization in Congressional Elections | 2011 | 2 |
About Adam Bonica
Adam Bonica is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Judicial and Constitutional Studies (24 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (22 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (19 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (13 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (11 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (10 papers), Media Influence and Politics (7 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (381 citations), Political Science and International Relations (901 citations) and Strategy and Management (485 citations). Adam Bonica has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Philippines and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Howard L. Rosenthal, Maya Sen, Keith T. Poole, Nolan McCarty, Michael J. Woodruff, Adam Chilton, David J. Rothman, Kyle Rozema, Jowei Chen and Tim Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, BMJ and The Journal of Economic Perspectives.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.