Adam Bonica
- Political Science and International Relations top 0.5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 2%
- Law top 0.2%
- Co-authors
- Howard L. RosenthalMaya SenKeith T. PooleNolan McCartyMichael J. WoodruffAdam ChiltonDavid J. RothmanKyle Rozema
- Topics
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies (24 papers)Electoral Systems and Political Participation (22 papers)Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (19 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPhilippinesRussia
In The Last Decade
Adam Bonica
52 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Political Science and International Relations 901
- Economics and Econometrics 568
- Sociology and Political Science 502
- Strategy and Management 485
- Law 381
Countries citing papers authored by Adam Bonica
This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Bonica's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Bonica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Bonica more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Bonica
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Bonica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Bonica. The network helps show where Adam Bonica may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adam Bonica
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adam Bonica. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adam Bonica based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adam Bonica. Adam Bonica is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | Judicial Reform as a Tug of War: How Ideological Differences Between Politicians and the Bar Explain Attempts at Judicial Reform | 1 |
| 10 | 25 | |
| 11 | 83 | |
| 12 | The Political Ideologies of American Lawyers | 47 |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 59 | |
| 17 | Breaching the Biennial Limit: Why the FEC Has Failed to Enforce Aggregate Hard-Money Limits and How Record Linkage Technology Can Help | 2 |
| 18 | Estimating Bureaucratic Ideal Points from Campaign Contributions | 2 |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | Small Donors, Special Interests and Polarization in Congressional Elections | 2 |
About Adam Bonica
Adam Bonica is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Judicial and Constitutional Studies (24 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (22 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (381 citations), Political Science and International Relations (901 citations) and Strategy and Management (485 citations). Adam Bonica has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Philippines and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Howard L. Rosenthal, Maya Sen, Keith T. Poole, Nolan McCarty, Michael J. Woodruff, Adam Chilton, David J. Rothman, Kyle Rozema, Jowei Chen and Tim Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, BMJ and The Journal of Economic Perspectives.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.