Countries where authors publish in Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Empirical Legal Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Empirical Legal Studies more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Empirical Legal Studies.
About Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
The 580 papers published in Journal of Empirical Legal Studies in the last decades have received a total of 8.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Empirical Legal Studies usually cover Law (243 papers), Pharmacy (70 papers), Economics and Econometrics (369 papers), Accounting (91 papers) and General Decision Sciences (12 papers) specifically the topics of Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (272 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (155 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (109 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (69 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (51 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (51 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (49 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (48 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Empirical Legal Studies are Theodore Eisenberg, Jeffrey Fagan, Tom R. Tyler, Marc Galanter, Bernard S. Black, Amanda Geller, James L. Gibson, Jeffrey Fagan, Alex R. Piquero and Vikramaditya S. Khanna.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.