Kim E. Dooley

1.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
84 papers, 921 citations indexed

About

Kim E. Dooley is a scholar working on Education, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Kim E. Dooley has authored 84 papers receiving a total of 921 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 46 papers in Education, 30 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and 8 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Kim E. Dooley's work include Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (25 papers), Online and Blended Learning (19 papers) and Service-Learning and Community Engagement (14 papers). Kim E. Dooley is often cited by papers focused on Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (25 papers), Online and Blended Learning (19 papers) and Service-Learning and Community Engagement (14 papers). Kim E. Dooley collaborates with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Ireland. Kim E. Dooley's co-authors include James R. Lindner, Theresa Pesl Murphrey, Leah E. Wickersham, Barry L. Boyd, Robert Strong, Tim H. Murphy, Chin‐Ling Lee, T. Grady Roberts, Larry M. Dooley and Kathleen D. Kelsey and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Bacteriology and Sustainability.

In The Last Decade

Kim E. Dooley

73 papers receiving 679 citations

Hit Papers

Barriers and Challenges Affecting Quality Education (Sust... 2024 2026 2025 2024 10 20 30 40

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kim E. Dooley United States 19 553 208 126 69 67 84 921
Krisanna Machtmes United States 10 252 0.5× 86 0.4× 52 0.4× 57 0.8× 86 1.3× 37 527
Aimee Howley United States 18 783 1.4× 205 1.0× 52 0.4× 75 1.1× 101 1.5× 84 957
Tim H. Murphy United States 10 278 0.5× 299 1.4× 43 0.3× 77 1.1× 96 1.4× 28 780
V. James Rhodes United States 18 513 0.9× 101 0.5× 90 0.7× 26 0.4× 107 1.6× 68 1.1k
William G. Camp United States 11 406 0.7× 300 1.4× 47 0.4× 69 1.0× 51 0.8× 47 685
Ricky Telg United States 11 194 0.4× 116 0.6× 40 0.3× 51 0.7× 151 2.3× 118 565
Martin Forsey Australia 15 579 1.0× 40 0.2× 72 0.6× 37 0.5× 376 5.6× 41 1.1k
Todd Reimer United States 3 835 1.5× 47 0.2× 158 1.3× 50 0.7× 183 2.7× 4 1.1k
Loek Nieuwenhuis Netherlands 17 468 0.8× 37 0.2× 91 0.7× 170 2.5× 58 0.9× 53 802
Keith Skamp Australia 20 1.0k 1.8× 214 1.0× 268 2.1× 185 2.7× 269 4.0× 74 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Kim E. Dooley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim E. Dooley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim E. Dooley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim E. Dooley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim E. Dooley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim E. Dooley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim E. Dooley. The network helps show where Kim E. Dooley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim E. Dooley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim E. Dooley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim E. Dooley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kim E. Dooley. Kim E. Dooley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Strong, Robert, et al.. (2024). Barriers and Challenges Affecting Quality Education (Sustainable Development Goal #4) in Sub-Saharan Africa by 2030. Sustainability. 16(7). 2657–2657. 40 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Strong, Robert, Kim E. Dooley, Jae-Hyun Ahn, et al.. (2023). Sustaining Global Food Systems with Youth Digital Livestock Production Curricula Interventions and Adoption to Professionally Develop Agents of Change. Sustainability. 15(18). 13896–13896. 1 indexed citations
3.
Dooley, Kim E., et al.. (2023). Unanticipated unity and independence: A photovoice of Ugandan gender-based agriculture issues. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(2). 74–90. 1 indexed citations
4.
5.
Strong, Robert, et al.. (2021). The EVAL framework: Developing impact evaluation scholars. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(3). 1–13. 6 indexed citations
6.
Dooley, Kim E., et al.. (2020). A cross case synthesis of the social and economic development of three Guatemalan coffee cooperatives. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(1). 1–13. 4 indexed citations
7.
Dooley, Kim E., et al.. (2017). Defining Leadership: Collegiate Women’s Learning Circles: A Qualitative Approach. Journal of Leadership Education. 16(1). 133–147. 2 indexed citations
8.
Murphrey, Theresa Pesl & Kim E. Dooley. (2006). Determining E-Learning Competencies: Using Centra[TM] to Collect Focus Group Data. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education. 7(1). 75–82. 4 indexed citations
9.
DeFranco, Agnes, et al.. (2005). Does It Matter? Analyzing the Results of Three Different Learning Delivery Methods.. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education. 6(2). 87–95. 20 indexed citations
10.
Dooley, Kim E., James R. Lindner, & Larry M. Dooley. (2005). Advanced Methods in Distance Education: Applications and Practices for Educators, Administrators and Learners. Journal of Bacteriology. 70(1). 30–4. 16 indexed citations
11.
DeFranco, Agnes, et al.. (2005). Does It Matter?. Quarterly review of distance education. 6(2). 87–95. 1 indexed citations
12.
Dooley, Kim E., Kathleen D. Kelsey, & James R. Lindner. (2003). Doc@Distance: Immersion in Advanced Study and Inquiry.. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education. 4(1). 43–50. 8 indexed citations
13.
Dooley, Kim E., et al.. (2003). Innovations in Distance Learning Program Development and Delivery.. Online journal of distance learning administration. 6(2). 20 indexed citations
14.
Lindner, James R., Kim E. Dooley, & Jennifer Williams. (2003). Teaching, Coaching, Mentoring, Facilitating, Motivating, Directing.What Is a Teacher to Do?. ˜The œAgricultural education magazine. 76(2). 26. 4 indexed citations
15.
Dooley, Kim E., et al.. (2002). All for One and One for All: Relationships in a Distance Education Program. Online journal of distance learning administration. 5(1). 9 indexed citations
16.
Murphy, Tim H., et al.. (2002). Lessons from a Student Teacher Laptop Program. ˜The œAgricultural education magazine. 75(1). 22.
17.
Lindner, James R., et al.. (2002). Faculty Philosophical Position towards Distance Education: Competency, Value, and Educational Technology Support.. Online journal of distance learning administration. 5(1). 445–51. 20 indexed citations
18.
Dooley, Kim E. & Theresa Pesl Murphrey. (2000). How the Perspectives of Administrators, Faculty, and Support Units Impact the Rate of Distance Education Adoption. Online journal of distance learning administration. 3(4). 58 indexed citations
19.
Dooley, Kim E., et al.. (1999). Food safety instructor training using distance education. The Journal of Extension. 37(3). 0–0. 3 indexed citations
20.
Dooley, Kim E.. (1999). Towards a Holistic Model for the Diffusion of EducationalTechnologies: An Integrative Review of Educational InnovationStudies.. Educational Technology & Society. 2. 47 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026