Kenneth D. Pimple

17 papers receiving 223 citations

Peers

Kenneth D. Pimple
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Safety Research 81
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 76
  • Information Systems and Management 49
  • General Health Professions 42
  • Sociology and Political Science 27
Replace Samuel V. Bruton with:
Samuel V. Bruton United States
Barton Moffatt United States
Olmo R. van den Akker Netherlands
Theiss Bendixen Denmark
David E. Drew United States
Margit Sutrop Estonia
Manuela Fernández Pinto Colombia
Jan De Winter United Kingdom
Amalia Monroe‐Gulick United States
Ursula McGowan Australia
Kenneth D. Pimple relative to Samuel V. Bruton United States Samuel V. Bruton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Samuel V. Bruton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth D. Pimple

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth D. Pimple's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth D. Pimple with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth D. Pimple more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth D. Pimple

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth D. Pimple. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth D. Pimple. The network helps show where Kenneth D. Pimple may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kenneth D. Pimple

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kenneth D. Pimple. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kenneth D. Pimple based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kenneth D. Pimple. Kenneth D. Pimple is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 9
3 2
4 17
5 7
6 1
7 2
8 22
9
How a Cancer Trial Ended in Betrayal
3
10 93
11
The Moral of the Story: Folktales for Character Development
2
12
Assessing Student Learning in the Responsible Conduct of Research
1
13
Ethical Issues in the Use of Animals in Research: A Special Issue of Ethics and Behavior
1
14
Teaching Research Ethics. A Workshop at Indiana University.
1
15 67
16
Moral Reasoning in Scientific Research
13
17
Subtle, but remorseful hypocrite': Dimmesdale's moral character
1
18 1
19
The Inmates of Eigenmann: A Look at Door Decoration in a Graduate Dormitory
1

About Kenneth D. Pimple

Kenneth D. Pimple is a scholar working on Safety Research, Classics and Law, having authored 19 papers that have together received 246 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic integrity and plagiarism (3 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (2 papers) and Legal Education and Practice Innovations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (81 citations), Information Systems and Management (49 citations) and Health Informatics (9 citations). Kenneth D. Pimple has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Diane Hoffman–Kim, Linda B. McGown, Philip J. Whitney, Douglas J. Adams, Javier de la Fuente, Laura Bix, David H. Smith, Muriel J. Bebeau, Sandra L. Borden and Michael C. Davis. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Communications of the ACM and Journal of Business Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026