Kenneth D. Pimple

65 total papers · 439 total citations
19 papers, 246 citations indexed

About

Kenneth D. Pimple is a scholar working on Safety Research, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Kenneth D. Pimple has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 246 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Safety Research, 2 papers in General Health Professions and 2 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Kenneth D. Pimple's work include Academic integrity and plagiarism (3 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (2 papers) and Legal Education and Practice Innovations (2 papers). Kenneth D. Pimple is often cited by papers focused on Academic integrity and plagiarism (3 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (2 papers) and Legal Education and Practice Innovations (2 papers). Kenneth D. Pimple collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Kenneth D. Pimple's co-authors include Philip J. Whitney, Diane Hoffman–Kim, Linda B. McGown, Douglas J. Adams, Javier de la Fuente, Laura Bix, David H. Smith, Sandra L. Borden, Muriel J. Bebeau and Michael C. Loui and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Communications of the ACM and Journal of Business Ethics.

In The Last Decade

Kenneth D. Pimple

17 papers receiving 223 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Kenneth D. Pimple 81 76 49 42 27 19 246
Samuel V. Bruton 142 1.8× 46 0.6× 57 1.2× 13 0.3× 25 0.9× 27 263
Jensen T. Mecca 30 0.4× 29 0.4× 47 1.0× 28 0.7× 35 1.3× 14 287
Barton Moffatt 53 0.7× 58 0.8× 51 1.0× 12 0.3× 35 1.3× 15 321
William Bülow 47 0.6× 36 0.5× 21 0.4× 10 0.2× 58 2.1× 25 146
Cynthia Townley 107 1.3× 11 0.1× 50 1.0× 15 0.4× 68 2.5× 19 257
Jonathan Sharples 22 0.3× 26 0.3× 28 0.6× 50 1.2× 23 0.9× 17 250
Christian König-Kersting 44 0.5× 15 0.2× 16 0.3× 5 0.1× 34 1.3× 16 193
Manuela Fernández Pinto 12 0.1× 22 0.3× 31 0.6× 18 0.4× 102 3.8× 22 207
Olmo R. van den Akker 30 0.4× 21 0.3× 26 0.5× 13 0.3× 68 2.5× 16 255
Margit Sutrop 37 0.5× 26 0.3× 10 0.2× 21 0.5× 23 0.9× 17 149

Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth D. Pimple

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth D. Pimple's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth D. Pimple with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth D. Pimple more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth D. Pimple

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth D. Pimple. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth D. Pimple. The network helps show where Kenneth D. Pimple may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kenneth D. Pimple

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kenneth D. Pimple. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kenneth D. Pimple based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kenneth D. Pimple. Kenneth D. Pimple is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026