Barton Moffatt

522 citations
15 papers · 324 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Barton Moffatt

14 papers receiving 298 citations

Peers

Barton Moffatt
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • History and Philosophy of Science 47
  • Pharmacology 83
  • Health Informatics 12
  • Information Systems and Management 51
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 46
Replace Kenneth D. Pimple with:
Kenneth D. Pimple United States
Samuel V. Bruton United States
Jensen T. Mecca United States
Sophia Crüwell Germany
Aurélien Allard Switzerland
Theiss Bendixen Denmark
Elizabeth L. Pier United States
Julia G. Bottesini United States
Sarah W. Beck United States
Olmo R. van den Akker Netherlands
Barton Moffatt relative to Kenneth D. Pimple United States Kenneth D. Pimple's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16×
Kenneth D. Pimple · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Barton Moffatt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Barton Moffatt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barton Moffatt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barton Moffatt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Barton Moffatt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barton Moffatt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barton Moffatt. The network helps show where Barton Moffatt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Barton Moffatt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Barton Moffatt Line = papers co-authored together Barton Moffatt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2003131
2 200775
3 201132
4 201819
5 201315
6 199812
7 201711
8 202410
9 20116
10 20004
11 20013
12 20132
13 20162
14
A Reexamination of Biological Information from the Perspective of Practice
20091
15 20111

About Barton Moffatt

Barton Moffatt is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Pharmacology, History and Philosophy of Science, Ocean Engineering and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 15 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic Publishing and Open Access (5 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (5 papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (2 papers), Academic integrity and plagiarism (2 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers) and Oil and Gas Production Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (47 citations), Pharmacology (83 citations), Health Informatics (12 citations), Information Systems and Management (51 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (46 citations). Barton Moffatt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ronald N. Giere, Carl Elliott, J.M. Williams, Brad S. Trinkle and Bård J.A. Bjørkvik. Their work appears in journals such as Accountability in Research, Journal of Medical Ethics, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Social Studies of Science and Philosophy of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact