Amalia Monroe‐Gulick
- Information Systems top 5%
- Library and Information Sciences top 2%
- Information Systems and Management top 10%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 10%
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 10%
- Co-authors
- Megan O’BrienGlen W. WhiteEmily WalshCharles E. DrumStephen T. HigginsTyler NighborBrent A. KaplanMikhail N. Koffarnus
- Topics
- Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (6 papers)Library Science and Information Literacy (5 papers)Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Amalia Monroe‐Gulick
20 papers receiving 232 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Information Systems 117
- Library and Information Sciences 48
- Information Systems and Management 45
- Management Science and Operations Research 39
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 30
Countries citing papers authored by Amalia Monroe‐Gulick
This map shows the geographic impact of Amalia Monroe‐Gulick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amalia Monroe‐Gulick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amalia Monroe‐Gulick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amalia Monroe‐Gulick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amalia Monroe‐Gulick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amalia Monroe‐Gulick. The network helps show where Amalia Monroe‐Gulick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amalia Monroe‐Gulick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amalia Monroe‐Gulick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amalia Monroe‐Gulick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amalia Monroe‐Gulick. Amalia Monroe‐Gulick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 33 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 41 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | Librarians as Partners: Moving from Research Supporters to Research Partners | 24 |
| 19 | 24 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Amalia Monroe‐Gulick
Amalia Monroe‐Gulick is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Conservation and Occupational Therapy, having authored 21 papers that have together received 255 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (6 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (5 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (48 citations), Information Systems and Management (45 citations) and Information Systems (117 citations). Amalia Monroe‐Gulick has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Megan O’Brien, Glen W. White, Emily Walsh, Charles E. Drum, Stephen T. Higgins, Tyler Nighbor, Brent A. Kaplan, Mikhail N. Koffarnus, Brett W. Gelino and Derek D. Reed. Their work appears in journals such as Autism, Criminal Justice and Behavior and Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.