Ken Springer

2.0k citations
28 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Ken Springer

28 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Ken Springer
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 724
  • Social Psychology 414
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 374
  • History and Philosophy of Science 83
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 208
Replace Barbara Koslowski with:
Barbara Koslowski United States
Kayoko Inagaki Japan
John Barresi Canada
Karen Bartsch United States
Joëlle Proust France
Merry Bullock Germany
Sandeep Prasada United States
Robert Morrison United States
Ernő Téglás United States
Christoph Hoerl United Kingdom
Ken Springer relative to Barbara Koslowski United States Barbara Koslowski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Barbara Koslowski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ken Springer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ken Springer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken Springer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken Springer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ken Springer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken Springer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken Springer. The network helps show where Ken Springer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Ken Springer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ken Springer Line = papers co-authored together Ken Springer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992166
2 1989148
3 1991125
4 199199
5 199285
6 199270
7 199667
8 199965
9
Educational Research: A Contextual Approach
200962
10 199355
11 199252
12 199245
13 199645
14 199542
15 199538
16 199434
17 199625
18 199420
19 201214
20 200113

About Ken Springer

Ken Springer is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Developmental Biology, Social Psychology and Statistics and Probability, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Animal Learning Development (13 papers), Evolution and Science Education (3 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (3 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (2 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (2 papers), Educational Environments and Student Outcomes (2 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (2 papers) and Science Education and Pedagogy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (724 citations), Social Psychology (414 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (374 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (83 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (208 citations). Ken Springer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Frank C. Keil, Scott H. Johnson, James E. Cutting, Diane S. Berry, Gregory L. Murphy, Leann L. Birch, Virginia Slaughter, Carol Nemeroff, Michael Siegal and Kayoko Inagaki. Their work appears in journals such as Child Development, Cognitive Development, Psychological Review, Developmental Psychology and Psychological Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026