Keith S. Folse
- Language and Linguistics top 1%
- EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning 9
- Lexicography and Language Studies 4
-
- Second Language Acquisition and Learning 8
- Reading and Literacy Development 2
- Language Development and Disorders 1
-
- Second Language Learning and Teaching 3
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Natural Language Processing Techniques 2
- Text Readability and Simplification 2
- Linguistics and Language top 10%
- Cited by
- Language and LinguisticsDevelopmental and Educational PsychologyLiterature and Literary Theory
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Keith S. Folse
32 papers receiving 540 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Language and Linguistics 458
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 514
- Literature and Literary Theory 197
- Artificial Intelligence 173
- Linguistics and Language 24
Countries citing papers authored by Keith S. Folse
This map shows the geographic impact of Keith S. Folse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith S. Folse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith S. Folse more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Keith S. Folse
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith S. Folse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith S. Folse. The network helps show where Keith S. Folse may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Keith S. Folse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 3 | The Grammar Answer Key: Short Explanations to 100 ESL Questions | 2018 | 0 |
| 4 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 7 | Six Vocabulary Activities for the English Language Classroom. | 2008 | 18 |
| 8 | 2007 | 47 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 16 | |
| 10 | Myths about Teaching and Learning Second Language Vocabulary: What Recent Research Says | 2004 | 49 |
| 11 | 2004 | 84 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 0 | |
| 14 | Top 10: Great Grammar for Great Writing | 2003 | 3 |
| 15 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 17 | Clear grammar : activities for spoken and written communication | 1998 | 2 |
| 18 | Talk a Lot: Communication Activities for Speaking Fluency | 1993 | 1 |
| 19 | 1986 | 1 | |
| 20 | Intermediate Reading Practices: Building Reading and Vocabulary Skills | 1985 | 0 |
About Keith S. Folse
Keith S. Folse is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 39 papers that have together received 681 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (9 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (8 papers), Lexicography and Language Studies (4 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (3 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers), Text Readability and Simplification (2 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (458 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (514 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (197 citations). Keith S. Folse has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Christine Coombe, Neil Anderson, Deborah J. Mitchell, Joan M. Fayer and Ehsan Rassaei. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Language Journal, TESOL Quarterly and System.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.