Kate Philip
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Leo B. HendryJanet ShucksmithJennifer SprattPhillip L. PearlCate WatsonK. Michael GibsonEdward J. NovotnyEdwin van Teijlingen
- Topics
- Mentoring and Academic Development (5 papers)Youth Development and Social Support (4 papers)Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
Kate Philip
30 papers receiving 504 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Clinical Psychology 147
- General Health Professions 140
- Education 131
- Social Psychology 121
- Sociology and Political Science 107
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Philip
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Philip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Philip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Philip more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Philip
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Philip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Philip. The network helps show where Kate Philip may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Philip
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Philip. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Philip based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Philip. Kate Philip is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 26 | |
| 3 | Towards the right to work: Innovations in Public Employment Programmes (IPEP) | 2 |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | A critical review of the literature on children and young people’s views of the factors that influence theirmental health : September 2009 | 2 |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 47 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 78 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 68 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 69 | |
| 20 | Educating for health : school and community approaches with adolescents | 10 |
About Kate Philip
Kate Philip is a scholar working on Safety Research, Speech and Hearing and Business and International Management, having authored 33 papers that have together received 593 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mentoring and Academic Development (5 papers), Youth Development and Social Support (4 papers) and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (90 citations), Speech and Hearing (57 citations) and Clinical Psychology (147 citations). Kate Philip has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Leo B. Hendry, Janet Shucksmith, Jennifer Spratt, Phillip L. Pearl, Cate Watson, K. Michael Gibson, Edward J. Novotny, Edwin van Teijlingen, Janet Tucker and Mari Imamura. Their work appears in journals such as Mechanisms of Development, Journal of Adolescence and Clinical Biochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.