Clinical Biochemistry

7.4k papers and 158.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 7.4k papers published in Clinical Biochemistry in the last decades have received a total of 158.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Biochemistry usually cover Molecular Biology (2.0k papers), Physiology (1.1k papers) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (1.0k papers) specifically the topics of Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (426 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (394 papers) and Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (276 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Biochemistry are Özcan Erel, Eleftherios P. Diamandis, Paul J. Taylor, Khosrow Adeli, Robert H. Christenson, David M. Goldberg, Christine Wyns, Suren N. Sehgal, Chukuka S. Enwemeka and G. Kesava Reddy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Biochemistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Biochemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Biochemistry.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Biochemistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Biochemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Biochemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Biochemistry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025