Clinical Biochemistry

7.5k papers and 167.3k indexed citations

About

The 7.5k papers published in Clinical Biochemistry in the last decades have received a total of 167.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Biochemistry usually cover Molecular Biology (2.0k papers), Physiology (1.1k papers) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (1.0k papers) specifically the topics of Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (435 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (395 papers) and Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (282 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Biochemistry are Özcan Erel, Paul J. Taylor, Eleftherios P. Diamandis, Christine Wyns, Khosrow Adeli, Robert H. Christenson, David M. Goldberg, Jiří Fröhlich, Suren N. Sehgal and Ignacio Núñez de Castro.

In The Last Decade

Clinical Biochemistry

7.2k papers receiving 160.9k citations

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Biochemistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Biochemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Biochemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Biochemistry more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Clinical Biochemistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Biochemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Biochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026