Fiona Harris

3.5k citations
58 papers · 2.3k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Fiona Harris

55 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Fiona Harris
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Gender Studies 236
  • General Health Professions 523
  • Public Administration 58
  • Applied Psychology 69
  • Clinical Psychology 287
Replace Chung Lim Vico Chiang with:
Chung Lim Vico Chiang Hong Kong
Leslie R. M. Hausmann United States
Miles Little Australia
Justin Jagosh United Kingdom
Bengt Starrin Sweden
Malcolm Boyle Australia
DeAnne K. Hilfinger Messias United States
Diane Gibson Australia
Amélie Quesnel‐Vallée Canada
Dianne Wynaden Australia
Fiona Harris relative to Chung Lim Vico Chiang Hong Kong Chung Lim Vico Chiang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Chung Lim Vico Chiang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fiona Harris

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fiona Harris's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fiona Harris with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fiona Harris more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fiona Harris

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fiona Harris. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fiona Harris. The network helps show where Fiona Harris may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fiona Harris, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fiona Harris Line = papers co-authored together Fiona Harris links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010263
2 1998252
3 2009236
4 2009161
5 2020114
6
Risk and Protective Factors for Suicide and Suicidal Behaviour: A Literature Review
200899
7 200792
8 201283
9 201777
10 201772
11 201670
12 199764
13 199755
14 199853
15 200747
16 201538
17 201937
18 201334
19 201631
20 199830

About Fiona Harris

Fiona Harris is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (5 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (4 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (3 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (236 citations), General Health Professions (523 citations), Public Administration (58 citations), Applied Psychology (69 citations) and Clinical Psychology (287 citations). Fiona Harris has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rosemary Crompton, Ruth Jepson, Stephen Platt, Aziz Sheikh, Carol Tannahill, Margaret Maxwell, Marilyn Kendall, Scott Murray, Emma Carduff and Alison Worth. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Public Health, Trials, PLoS ONE, BMJ Open and Work Employment and Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact