Júlia Montenegro

420 citations
18 papers · 278 · h-index 10

Impact in

  • Biochemistry top 10%
    • Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Forestry top 10%
    • Agricultural and Food Sciences

Papers in

    • Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities 4
    • Botanical Research and Applications 2
    • Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity 2

Júlia Montenegro

16 papers receiving 272 citations

Peers

Júlia Montenegro
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Biochemistry 62
  • Forestry 22
  • Horticulture 3
  • Food Science 50
  • Pharmacology 42
Replace Susmita Das with:
Susmita Das India
Gabriel Araújo‐Silva Brazil
Débora Kono Taketa Moreira Brazil
Clara Sandra de Araújo Sugizaki Brazil
Christoph H. Weinert Germany
E. U. Etuk Nigeria
Claudia Favari Italy
Iram Iqbal Pakistan
Abdelhamid Zaîd Morocco
Ingvild Austarheim Norway
Júlia Montenegro relative to Susmita Das India Susmita Das's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Susmita Das · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Júlia Montenegro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Júlia Montenegro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Júlia Montenegro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Júlia Montenegro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Júlia Montenegro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Júlia Montenegro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Júlia Montenegro. The network helps show where Júlia Montenegro may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Júlia Montenegro, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Júlia Montenegro Line = papers co-authored together Júlia Montenegro links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 202341
2 202041
3 202035
4 202124
5 202122
6 202021
7 202317
8 200016
9 202015
10 201612
11 20179
12 20228
13 20228
14 20215
15 20243
16 20231
17 20250
18 20240

About Júlia Montenegro

Júlia Montenegro is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Food Science, Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 278 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (4 papers), Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications (4 papers), Coffee research and impacts (3 papers), Tea Polyphenols and Effects (3 papers), Agricultural and Food Sciences (2 papers), Botanical Research and Applications (2 papers), Gut microbiota and health (2 papers) and Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (62 citations), Forestry (22 citations), Horticulture (3 citations), Food Science (50 citations) and Pharmacology (42 citations). Júlia Montenegro has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Anderson Junger Teodoro, Carla M. Prado, Otniel Freitas‐Silva, Joel Pimentel de Abreu, Priscila Giácomo Fassini, Anissa M. Armet, Jens Walter, João Felipe Mota, Benjamin P. Willing and Edward C. Deehan. Their work appears in journals such as Molecules, Food Research International, BioMed Research International, Nutrition and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact