Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design
2017967 citationsJudith Schoonenboom, R. Burke Johnsonprofile →
Developing a teacher identity in the university context: a systematic review of the literature
2016269 citationsThea van Lankveld, Judith Schoonenboom et al.Higher Education Research & Developmentprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Judith Schoonenboom
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Judith Schoonenboom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Judith Schoonenboom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judith Schoonenboom more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Judith Schoonenboom
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Judith Schoonenboom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Judith Schoonenboom. The network helps show where Judith Schoonenboom may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Judith Schoonenboom
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Judith Schoonenboom.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Judith Schoonenboom based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Judith Schoonenboom. Judith Schoonenboom is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Schoonenboom, Judith, John H. Hitchcock, & R. Burke Johnson. (2018). How to Interact with Differences in Special Education Intervention Research: Six Guidelines.. Research in the schools. 25(2). 34–43.1 indexed citations
4.
Hitchcock, John H., R. Burke Johnson, & Judith Schoonenboom. (2018). Idiographic and Nomothetic Causal Inference in Special Education Research and Practice: Mixed Methods Perspectives.. Research in the schools. 25(2). 56–67.1 indexed citations
Lankveld, Thea van, Judith Schoonenboom, Monique Volman, Gerda Croiset, & J.J. Beishuizen. (2016). Developing a teacher identity in the university context: a systematic review of the literature. Higher Education Research & Development. 36(2). 325–342.269 indexed citations breakdown →
Korthagen, Fred, et al.. (2015). De invloed van intrapersoonlijke factoren op studieresultaten van eerstejaars pabostudenten en de mediërende rol van academisch uitstelgedrag. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 92(6). 394–412.5 indexed citations
Stefanov, Krassen, et al.. (2008). Evaluation of TENCompetence proof of concept assessment tools. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).3 indexed citations
17.
Schoonenboom, Judith, et al.. (2007). Trails in Education.9 indexed citations
18.
Schoonenboom, Judith, et al.. (2006). A four-stage model for lifelong competence development. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).6 indexed citations
19.
Schoonenboom, Judith, et al.. (2006). Supporting curriculum development by visualizing a continuous learning pathway. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).
20.
Schoonenboom, Judith. (2000). Analyse, norm en gebruik als factoren van taalverandering. Een studie naar veranderingen in het Nederlands onzijdig neutrum. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.