Joy Crawford

921 total citations
9 papers, 664 citations indexed

About

Joy Crawford is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Joy Crawford has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 664 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 3 papers in Social Psychology and 3 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Joy Crawford's work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (3 papers) and Career Development and Diversity (3 papers). Joy Crawford is often cited by papers focused on Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (3 papers) and Career Development and Diversity (3 papers). Joy Crawford collaborates with scholars based in United States. Joy Crawford's co-authors include Diane Carlson Jones, Rebecca Bates, Nanette Veilleux, Melani Plett, Denise Wilson, Tamara Floyd‐Smith, Mee Joo Kim, Fraser D. Bocell and Elaine P. Scott and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Youth and Adolescence and Research in Higher Education.

In The Last Decade

Joy Crawford

9 papers receiving 619 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Joy Crawford United States	6	335	194	133	111	102	9	664
Vanessa M. Buote Canada	4	418 1.2×	118 0.6×	23 0.2×	83 0.7×	192 1.9×	5	757
Stefanie B. Waschull United States	9	358 1.1×	188 1.0×	17 0.1×	108 1.0×	273 2.7×	10	767
Diana E. Betz United States	5	129 0.4×	71 0.4×	133 1.0×	29 0.3×	67 0.7×	10	387
Tammy L. Hughes United States	15	406 1.2×	178 0.9×	45 0.3×	25 0.2×	149 1.5×	54	696
Vincent Basile United States	9	218 0.7×	138 0.7×	64 0.5×	256 2.3×	58 0.6×	16	539
Patricia A. Connor‐Greene United States	12	120 0.4×	225 1.2×	8 0.1×	34 0.3×	68 0.7×	20	479
Dale Cusumano United States	9	469 1.4×	85 0.4×	20 0.2×	100 0.9×	37 0.4×	15	629
Cathy van Tuijl Netherlands	13	597 1.8×	457 2.4×	97 0.7×	23 0.2×	232 2.3×	24	967
Marilyn T. Zivian Canada	6	262 0.8×	22 0.1×	11 0.1×	65 0.6×	50 0.5×	11	424
Jorge Sobral Spain	13	338 1.0×	85 0.4×	37 0.3×	4 0.0×	208 2.0×	39	635

Countries citing papers authored by Joy Crawford

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joy Crawford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joy Crawford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joy Crawford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joy Crawford

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joy Crawford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joy Crawford. The network helps show where Joy Crawford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joy Crawford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joy Crawford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joy Crawford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joy Crawford. Joy Crawford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Plett, Melani, Diane Carlson Jones, Joy Crawford, et al.. (2020). STEM Seniors: Strong Connections to Community Are Associated with Identity and Positive Affect in the Classroom. 22.1324.1–22.1324.18. 7 indexed citations

2.

Crawford, Joy, et al.. (2018). Creating Opportunities for OT-OTA Student Learning Through Community Collaborations. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(2). 5 indexed citations

3.

Wilson, Denise, Diane Carlson Jones, Fraser D. Bocell, et al.. (2015). Belonging and Academic Engagement Among Undergraduate STEM Students: A Multi-institutional Study. Research in Higher Education. 56(7). 750–776. 207 indexed citations

4.

Wilson, Denise, Diane Carlson Jones, Mee Joo Kim, et al.. (2014). The Link between Cocurricular Activities and Academic Engagement in Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education. 103(4). 625–651. 42 indexed citations

5.

Wilson, Denise, Rebecca Bates, Joy Crawford, et al.. (2012). Strategic Pathways for Success: The Influence of Outside Community on Academic Engagement. Journal of Engineering Education. 101(3). 512–538. 40 indexed citations

6.

Veilleux, Nanette, et al.. (2012). The role of belonging in engagement, retention and persistence in computer science (abstract only). 707–707. 5 indexed citations

7.

Wilson, Denise, Diane Carlson Jones, Joy Crawford, et al.. (2012). Communities that make a difference: The STEM student perspective. 14. 1–6. 2 indexed citations

8.

Jones, Diane Carlson & Joy Crawford. (2006). The Peer Appearance Culture During Adolescence: Gender and Body Mass Variations. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 35(2). 243–255. 192 indexed citations

9.

Jones, Diane Carlson & Joy Crawford. (2005). Adolescent Boys and Body Image: Weight and Muscularity Concerns as Dual Pathways to Body Dissatisfaction. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 34(6). 629–636. 164 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact