Fraser D. Bocell

679 total citations
21 papers, 429 citations indexed

About

Fraser D. Bocell is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Fraser D. Bocell has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 429 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Epidemiology, 6 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 4 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Fraser D. Bocell's work include Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (3 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (3 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers). Fraser D. Bocell is often cited by papers focused on Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (3 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (3 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers). Fraser D. Bocell collaborates with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Fraser D. Bocell's co-authors include Dagmar Amtmann, Mee Joo Kim, Diane Carlson Jones, Nanette Veilleux, Joy Crawford, Rebecca Bates, Denise Wilson, Melani Plett, Tamara Floyd‐Smith and Alyssa M. Bamer and has published in prestigious journals such as Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Quality of Life Research and Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology.

In The Last Decade

Fraser D. Bocell

18 papers receiving 415 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Fraser D. Bocell United States 11 134 85 74 69 62 21 429
Erica Gobbi Italy 16 57 0.4× 66 0.8× 179 2.4× 74 1.1× 165 2.7× 57 763
Linda Sheppard United Kingdom 15 33 0.2× 141 1.7× 148 2.0× 90 1.3× 69 1.1× 26 706
John Hanes United States 6 51 0.4× 37 0.4× 62 0.8× 70 1.0× 82 1.3× 10 637
Toni L. Williams United Kingdom 13 35 0.3× 105 1.2× 66 0.9× 180 2.6× 126 2.0× 39 697
Maryellen Brunson McClain United States 14 125 0.9× 24 0.3× 317 4.3× 133 1.9× 43 0.7× 64 652
Sofia Santos Portugal 12 70 0.5× 94 1.1× 138 1.9× 61 0.9× 12 0.2× 57 370
Chungyi Chiu United States 13 24 0.2× 63 0.7× 83 1.1× 94 1.4× 40 0.6× 55 542
Shahrum Vahedi Iran 9 59 0.4× 18 0.2× 130 1.8× 23 0.3× 67 1.1× 13 354
Yan Tang China 16 68 0.5× 35 0.4× 76 1.0× 15 0.2× 74 1.2× 47 773
María Fernández Spain 10 61 0.5× 63 0.7× 65 0.9× 36 0.5× 36 0.6× 25 313

Countries citing papers authored by Fraser D. Bocell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fraser D. Bocell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fraser D. Bocell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fraser D. Bocell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fraser D. Bocell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fraser D. Bocell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fraser D. Bocell. The network helps show where Fraser D. Bocell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fraser D. Bocell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fraser D. Bocell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fraser D. Bocell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fraser D. Bocell. Fraser D. Bocell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Olds, Danielle, John A. Spertus, Shannon M. Dunlay, et al.. (2025). Assessing the Relevance of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire in Patients With Tricuspid Regurgitation: The Tri-QOL Qualitative Study. Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 18(4). e011245–e011245.
2.
Bhushan, Nivedita L., Carla DeMuro, Jenna E. Reno, et al.. (2024). Remote-Use Applications of the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised Clinical Outcome Assessment Tool: A Scoping Review. Value in Health. 27(10). 1454–1465. 2 indexed citations
5.
Elstad, Emily A., Fraser D. Bocell, San Keller, et al.. (2023). Focus Groups to Inform the Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) for Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (TMDs). Patient. 16(3). 265–276. 2 indexed citations
6.
Keller, San, et al.. (2022). Patient-reported outcome measures for individuals with temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review and evaluation. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 135(1). 65–78. 11 indexed citations
7.
Coles, Theresa, Li Lin, Kevin P. Weinfurt, et al.. (2022). Do PRO Measures Function the Same Way for all Individuals With Heart Failure?. Journal of Cardiac Failure. 29(2). 210–216. 1 indexed citations
8.
Coles, Theresa, Nicole Lucas, Molly McFatrich, et al.. (2022). Investigating gender-based differential item functioning on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) using qualitative content analysis. Quality of Life Research. 32(3). 841–852.
9.
Amtmann, Dagmar, Alyssa M. Bamer, Kevin N. Alschuler, et al.. (2020). Development of a resilience item bank and short forms.. Rehabilitation Psychology. 65(2). 145–157. 19 indexed citations
10.
Flythe, Jennifer E., Tandrea Hilliard, San Keller, et al.. (2020). Toward Patient-Centered Innovation. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 15(10). 1522–1530. 5 indexed citations
11.
Johnson, Kurt, et al.. (2019). The Relationship Between Resilience, Self-Efficacy, and Employment in People With Physical Disabilities. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin. 63(4). 195–205. 8 indexed citations
12.
Wilson, Rozanne, Fraser D. Bocell, Alyssa M. Bamer, Rana Salem, & Dagmar Amtmann. (2019). Satisfaction with social role participation in adults living with chronic conditions: Comparison to a US general population sample. Cogent Psychology. 6(1). 2 indexed citations
13.
Amtmann, Dagmar, Fraser D. Bocell, Kara McMullen, et al.. (2017). Satisfaction With Life Over Time in People With Burn Injury: A National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Burn Model System Study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 101(1). S63–S70. 15 indexed citations
14.
Amtmann, Dagmar, Alyssa M. Bamer, Jiseon Kim, et al.. (2017). A comparison of computerized adaptive testing and fixed-length short forms for the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-MTM). Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 42(5). 476–482. 16 indexed citations
15.
Jensen, Mark P., Kendra Liljenquist, Fraser D. Bocell, et al.. (2017). Life impact of caregiving for severe childhood epilepsy: Results of expert panels and caregiver focus groups. Epilepsy & Behavior. 74. 135–143. 55 indexed citations
17.
Amtmann, Dagmar, Kendra Liljenquist, Alyssa M. Bamer, et al.. (2017). Measuring Pain Catastrophizing and Pain-Related Self-Efficacy: Expert Panels, Focus Groups, and Cognitive Interviews. Patient. 11(1). 107–117. 22 indexed citations
18.
Amtmann, Dagmar, Kara McMullen, Jiseon Kim, et al.. (2016). Psychometric Properties of the Modified 5-D Itch Scale in a Burn Model System Sample of People With Burn Injury. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 38(1). e402–e408. 11 indexed citations
19.
Chung, Hyewon, et al.. (2016). Testing the measurement invariance of the University of Washington Self-Efficacy Scale short form across four diagnostic subgroups. Quality of Life Research. 25(10). 2559–2564. 14 indexed citations
20.
Wilson, Denise, Diane Carlson Jones, Fraser D. Bocell, et al.. (2015). Belonging and Academic Engagement Among Undergraduate STEM Students: A Multi-institutional Study. Research in Higher Education. 56(7). 750–776. 207 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026