Peter Hanks

779 total citations
17 papers, 323 citations indexed

About

Peter Hanks is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Hanks has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 323 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 12 papers in Philosophy and 4 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Peter Hanks's work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (12 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (7 papers) and Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (3 papers). Peter Hanks is often cited by papers focused on Philosophy and Theoretical Science (12 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (7 papers) and Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (3 papers). Peter Hanks collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Peter Hanks's co-authors include Brendan O’Sullivan and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Synthese.

In The Last Decade

Peter Hanks

16 papers receiving 300 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Peter Hanks United States	9	247	209	83	66	54	17	323
Dilip Ninan United States	10	226 0.9×	214 1.0×	55 0.7×	99 1.5×	116 2.1×	22	366
Delia Graff United States	7	199 0.8×	151 0.7×	58 0.7×	114 1.7×	80 1.5×	9	338
Michael Glanzberg United States	11	306 1.2×	246 1.2×	84 1.0×	134 2.0×	96 1.8×	25	424
Henry Jackman Canada	10	160 0.6×	144 0.7×	49 0.6×	35 0.5×	103 1.9×	34	300
Genoveva Martí Spain	9	142 0.6×	105 0.5×	88 1.1×	42 0.6×	26 0.5×	29	222
Justin Khoo United States	10	109 0.4×	150 0.7×	39 0.5×	93 1.4×	56 1.0×	22	264
Mark Crimmins United States	8	323 1.3×	269 1.3×	84 1.0×	98 1.5×	77 1.4×	16	449
Isidora Stojanovic France	8	143 0.6×	160 0.8×	20 0.2×	43 0.7×	82 1.5×	23	250
Dorothy Grover United States	8	236 1.0×	220 1.1×	127 1.5×	59 0.9×	15 0.3×	14	372
Anthony Everett United Kingdom	7	267 1.1×	205 1.0×	121 1.5×	38 0.6×	26 0.5×	15	330

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Hanks

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Hanks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Hanks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Hanks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Hanks

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Hanks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Hanks. The network helps show where Peter Hanks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Hanks

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Hanks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Hanks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Hanks. Peter Hanks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

1.

Hanks, Peter. (2019). Soames on the Tractatus. Philosophical Studies. 176(5). 1367–1376. 1 indexed citations

2.

Hanks, Peter. (2018). Types of Speech Acts. Oxford University Press eBooks. 6 indexed citations

3.

Hanks, Peter. (2017). The Explanatory Role of Propositions. Analysis. 77(2). 370–379. 1 indexed citations

4.

Hanks, Peter. (2017). Predication and rule-following. 199–221. 1 indexed citations

5.

Hanks, Peter. (2016). On cancellation. Synthese. 196(4). 1385–1402. 11 indexed citations

6.

Hanks, Peter. (2015). Propositional Content. Oxford University Press eBooks. 104 indexed citations

7.

Hanks, Peter. (2014). Bipolarity and Sense in the Tractatus. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(9). 3 indexed citations

8.

Hanks, Peter. (2013). What are the primary bearers of truth?. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 43(5-6). 558–574. 11 indexed citations

9.

Hanks, Peter. (2012). First‐Person Propositions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 86(1). 155–182. 13 indexed citations

10.

Hanks, Peter. (2011). Structured Propositions as Types. Mind. 120(477). 11–52. 78 indexed citations

11.

Hanks, Peter. (2009). Recent Work on Propositions. Philosophy Compass. 4(3). 469–486. 15 indexed citations

12.

Hanks, Peter. (2008). Belief about the Self: A Defense of the Property Theory of Content. 11 indexed citations

13.

O’Sullivan, Brendan & Peter Hanks. (2008). Conceiving of Pain. Dialogue. 47(2). 351–376.

14.

Hanks, Peter. (2007). The Content–Force Distinction. Philosophical Studies. 134(2). 141–164. 42 indexed citations

15.

Hanks, Peter. (2007). A Dilemma About Necessity. Erkenntnis. 68(1). 129–148. 6 indexed citations

16.

Hanks, Peter. (2006). How Wittgenstein Defeated Russell’s Multiple Relation Theory of Judgment. Synthese. 154(1). 121–146. 18 indexed citations

17.

Hanks, Peter. (2006). Reference Without Referents. Disputatio. 1(20). 368–375. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact