Simon Goldstein
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in ⓘ
- Philosophy 18
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 17
-
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 12
- Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation 4
- Logic, programming, and type systems 3
- Co-authors
- Bob Beddor (3 shared papers)Dan Hendrycks (1 shared paper)Peter S. Park (1 shared paper)Michael Chen (1 shared paper)Fabrizio Cariani (1 shared paper)John Hawthorne (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Philosophical Studies (4 papers)Mind (4 papers)The Journal of Philosophy (3 papers)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (2 papers)Linguistics and Philosophy (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- Hong KongAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Simon Goldstein
25 papers receiving 182 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Philosophy 102
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 77
- General Decision Sciences 6
- Safety Research 25
- Health Informatics 4
Countries citing papers authored by Simon Goldstein
This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Goldstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Goldstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Goldstein more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Simon Goldstein
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Goldstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Goldstein. The network helps show where Simon Goldstein may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Simon Goldstein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AI deception: A survey of examples, risks, and potential solutions Hit paper breakdown → | 2024 | 51 |
| 2 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 15 | |
| 5 | A preface paradox for intention | 2016 | 15 |
| 6 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 18 | Epistemic modal credence | 2020 | 2 |
| 19 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 2 |
About Simon Goldstein
Simon Goldstein is a scholar working on Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Safety Research, having authored 29 papers that have together received 204 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (17 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (14 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (12 papers), Free Will and Agency (7 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (4 papers) and Logic, programming, and type systems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (102 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (77 citations), General Decision Sciences (6 citations), Safety Research (25 citations) and Health Informatics (4 citations). Simon Goldstein has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bob Beddor, Dan Hendrycks, Peter S. Park, Michael Chen, Fabrizio Cariani and John Hawthorne. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Mind, The Journal of Philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Linguistics and Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.