Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Asher
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Asher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Asher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Asher more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Asher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Asher. The network helps show where Nicholas Asher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas Asher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas Asher.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas Asher based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas Asher. Nicholas Asher is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hunter, Julie & Nicholas Asher. (2018). Composing discourse parenthetical reports. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung. 21(1). 587–604.
8.
Hunter, Julie, Nicholas Asher, & Alex Lascarides. (2015). Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computational Semantics.60 indexed citations
9.
Asher, Nicholas, et al.. (2015). Preference Change. Journal of Logic Language and Information. 24(3). 267–288.4 indexed citations
10.
Asher, Nicholas. (2013). Time. Oxford University Press eBooks.7 indexed citations
11.
Asher, Nicholas, et al.. (2011). Commitments to Preferences in Dialogue. Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue. 204–215.4 indexed citations
12.
Asher, Nicholas, et al.. (2008). Distilling Opinion in Discourse: A Preliminary Study. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 7–10.28 indexed citations
Asher, Nicholas, et al.. (2001). Negated defaults in commonsense entailment. 30(1).1 indexed citations
16.
Asher, Nicholas & James Pustejovsky. (2000). The Metaphysics of Words in Context.3 indexed citations
17.
Asher, Nicholas. (1996). Commonsense entailment: a conditional logic for some generics. Oxford University Press eBooks. 103–145.7 indexed citations
18.
Lascarides, Alex, et al.. (1995). Persistent Order Independent Typed Default Unification. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).2 indexed citations
19.
Asher, Nicholas & Laure Vieu. (1995). Toward a geometry of common sense: a semantics and a complete axiomatization of mereotopology. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 846–852.92 indexed citations
20.
Asher, Nicholas & Michael Morreau. (1991). Commonsense entailment: a modal theory of nonmonotonic reasoning. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 387–392.31 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.