Linguistics and Philosophy

927 papers and 31.5k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 927 papers published in Linguistics and Philosophy in the last decades have received a total of 31.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Linguistics and Philosophy usually cover Language and Linguistics (545 papers), Artificial Intelligence (416 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (308 papers) specifically the topics of Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (485 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (226 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (208 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Linguistics and Philosophy are Angelika Kratzer, Robert Stalnaker, Christopher Kennedy, Lauri Karttunen, Emmon Bach, Peter Lasersohn, Robin Cooper, David R. Dowty, Tanya Reinhart and Jason Merchant.

In The Last Decade

Linguistics and Philosophy

762 papers receiving 23.1k citations

Fields of papers published in Linguistics and Philosophy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Linguistics and Philosophy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Linguistics and Philosophy.

Countries where authors publish in Linguistics and Philosophy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Linguistics and Philosophy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Linguistics and Philosophy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linguistics and Philosophy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026