Joseph L. Peterson
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Law top 5%
- Jury Decision Making Processes 1
-
- Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods 2
-
- Forensic and Genetic Research 3
-
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 2
-
- Law, AI, and Intellectual Property 1
-
- Digital and Cyber Forensics 1
-
- Legal Systems and Judicial Processes 1
- Policing Practices and Perceptions 1
- Co-authors
- Ira SommersDeborah R. BaskinKevin J. StromPenelope N. MarkhamPeter R. De ForestMichelle HoYihua ChenGuozhen Lin
- Journals
- Journal of Forensic Sciences (5 papers)Violence Against Women (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Joseph L. Peterson
12 papers receiving 219 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Gender Studies 79
- Chemical Health and Safety 5
- Law 42
- Safety Research 25
- Health 23
Countries citing papers authored by Joseph L. Peterson
This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph L. Peterson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph L. Peterson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph L. Peterson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph L. Peterson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph L. Peterson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph L. Peterson. The network helps show where Joseph L. Peterson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Joseph L. Peterson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 63 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 66 | |
| 4 | Reference Guide on Forensic Identification Expertise | 2011 | 4 |
| 5 | THE EVOLUTION OF FORENSIC SCIENCE: PROGRESS AMID THE PITFALLS ∗ | 2007 | 8 |
| 6 | 2003 | 15 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 24 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 7 | |
| 9 | Forensic evidence and the police : the effects of scientific evidence on criminal investigations | 1984 | 30 |
| 10 | Crime Laboratory Proficiency Testing Research Program. | 1978 | 15 |
| 11 | 1977 | 14 | |
| 12 | Forensic science : scientific investigation in criminal justice | 1975 | 4 |
About Joseph L. Peterson
Joseph L. Peterson is a scholar working on Safety Research, Information Systems and Management and Genetics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 254 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic and Genetic Research (3 papers), Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (2 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers), Law, AI, and Intellectual Property (1 paper), Digital and Cyber Forensics (1 paper), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (1 paper), Jury Decision Making Processes (1 paper) and Policing Practices and Perceptions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (79 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (5 citations) and Law (42 citations). Joseph L. Peterson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ira Sommers, Deborah R. Baskin, Kevin J. Strom, Penelope N. Markham, Peter R. De Forest, Michelle Ho, Yihua Chen, Guozhen Lin, R. E. Gaensslen and Edward J. Imwinkelried. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Forensic Sciences, Violence Against Women and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.