Countries citing papers authored by Edward J. Imwinkelried
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward J. Imwinkelried's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward J. Imwinkelried with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward J. Imwinkelried more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward J. Imwinkelried
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward J. Imwinkelried. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward J. Imwinkelried. The network helps show where Edward J. Imwinkelried may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward J. Imwinkelried
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward J. Imwinkelried.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward J. Imwinkelried based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Edward J. Imwinkelried. Edward J. Imwinkelried is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Imwinkelried, Edward J.. (2016). Computer Source Code: A Source of the Growing Controversy Over the Reliability of Automated Forensic Techniques. The De Paul law review. 66(1). 6.2 indexed citations
2.
Imwinkelried, Edward J.. (2016). Virginia State Bar Association.
3.
Imwinkelried, Edward J. & Jason Luu. (2015). The Challenge of Bitcoin Pseudo-Anonymity to Computer Forensics. SSRN Electronic Journal.7 indexed citations
4.
Imwinkelried, Edward J.. (2007). Impoverishing the Trier of Fact: Excluding the Proponent's Expert Testimony Due to the Opponent's Inability to Afford Rebuttal Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
5.
Imwinkelried, Edward J.. (2004). The Relativity of Reliability. Seton Hall Law Review. 34(1). 10.3 indexed citations
6.
Imwinkelried, Edward J. & William A. Tobin. (2003). Comparative Bullet Lead Analysis Evidence: Valid Inference or Ipse Dixit?. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
7.
Kaye, David H. & Edward J. Imwinkelried. (2001). DNA Typing: Emerging or Neglected Issues. Washington law review. 76(2). 413.2 indexed citations
8.
Imwinkelried, Edward J.. (2000). Trial Judges: Gatekeepers or Usurpers? Can the Trial Judge Critically Assess the Admissibility of Expert Testimony Without Invading the Jury's Province to Evaluate the Credibility and Weight of the Testimony?. Marquette law review. 84(1). 1.1 indexed citations
9.
Imwinkelried, Edward J., et al.. (1998). Cyberspace: The Newest Challenge for Traditional Legal Doctrine. 24(2). 305–343.2 indexed citations
10.
Imwinkelried, Edward J.. (1995). Coming to Grips with Scientific Research in Daubert' "Brave New World": The Courts' Need to Appreciate the Evidentiary Differences between Validity and Proficiency Studies. Brooklyn law review. 61(4). 1247.5 indexed citations
11.
Imwinkelried, Edward J.. (1993). A New Antidote for an Opponent's Pretrial Discovery Misconduct: Treating the Misconduct at Trial as an Admission by Conduct of the Weakness of the Opponent's Case. Brigham Young University law review. 1993(3). 793–825.1 indexed citations
12.
Imwinkelried, Edward J.. (1992). The Worst Evidence Principle: The Best Hypothesis as to the Logical Structure of Evidence Law. University of Miami law review. 46(5). 1069.2 indexed citations
13.
Imwinkelried, Edward J.. (1991). The Debate in the DNA Cases Over the Foundation for the Admission of Scientific Evidence: The Importance of Human Error as a Cause of Forensic Misanalysis. Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis). 69(1). 19–47.3 indexed citations
14.
Imwinkelried, Edward J.. (1991). A Comparativist Critique of the Interface Between Hearsay and Expert Opinion in American Evidence Law. Boston College law review. 33(1). 1.2 indexed citations
15.
Imwinkelried, Edward J.. (1990). The Application of the Attorney-Client Privilege to Non-Testifying Experts: Reestablishing the Boundaries Between the Attorney-Client Privilege and the Work Product Protection. Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis). 68(1). 19–50.1 indexed citations
16.
Imwinkelried, Edward J.. (1988). The Bases of Expert Testimony: The Syllogistic Structure of Scientific Testimony. North Carolina law review. 67(1). 1.3 indexed citations
17.
Imwinkelried, Edward J.. (1985). Plan Theory for Admitting Evidence of the Defendant's Uncharged Crimes: A Microcosm of the Flaws in the Uncharged Misconduct Doctrine, The. Missouri law review. 50(1). 6.1 indexed citations
18.
Imwinkelried, Edward J.. (1984). Uncharged misconduct evidence.2 indexed citations
19.
Imwinkelried, Edward J.. (1984). Judge Versus Jury: Who Should Decide Questions of Preliminary Facts Conditioning the Admissibility of Scientific Evidence?. William and Mary law review. 25(4). 577.4 indexed citations
20.
Imwinkelried, Edward J.. (1982). Forensic Hair Analysis: The CaseAgainst The Underemployment OfScientific Evidence. Washington and Lee law review. 39(1). 41.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.