Mike Redmayne

645 total citations
27 papers, 282 citations indexed

About

Mike Redmayne is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mike Redmayne has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 282 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Law, 4 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Mike Redmayne's work include Jury Decision Making Processes (11 papers), Criminal Law and Evidence (10 papers) and Law in Society and Culture (5 papers). Mike Redmayne is often cited by papers focused on Jury Decision Making Processes (11 papers), Criminal Law and Evidence (10 papers) and Law in Society and Culture (5 papers). Mike Redmayne collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Mike Redmayne's co-authors include Liz Campbell, Andrew Ashworth, Martin Wasik and Thomas Gibbons and has published in prestigious journals such as Modern Law Review, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies and Law Probability and Risk.

In The Last Decade

Mike Redmayne

25 papers receiving 245 citations

Peers

Mike Redmayne
David Hamer Australia
Dale A. Nance United States
Paul Bergman United States
Emily West United States
A. P. Simester United Kingdom
Richard K. Sherwin United States
Toni M. Massaro United States
David Hamer Australia
Mike Redmayne
Citations per year, relative to Mike Redmayne Mike Redmayne (= 1×) peers David Hamer

Countries citing papers authored by Mike Redmayne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mike Redmayne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mike Redmayne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mike Redmayne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mike Redmayne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mike Redmayne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mike Redmayne. The network helps show where Mike Redmayne may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mike Redmayne

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mike Redmayne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mike Redmayne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mike Redmayne. Mike Redmayne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Campbell, Liz, Andrew Ashworth, & Mike Redmayne. (2019). The Criminal Process. Oxford University Press eBooks. 6 indexed citations
2.
Redmayne, Mike. (2015). Character in the Criminal Trial. Oxford University Press eBooks. 23 indexed citations
3.
4.
Redmayne, Mike. (2010). Confronting Confrontation. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
5.
Redmayne, Mike, et al.. (2010). The Criminal Process. Oxford University Press eBooks. 42 indexed citations
6.
Redmayne, Mike. (2009). Theorizing the Criminal Trial. New Criminal Law Review. 12(2). 287–313. 3 indexed citations
7.
Redmayne, Mike. (2008). The Ethics of Character Evidence. Current Legal Problems. 61(1). 371–399. 3 indexed citations
8.
Redmayne, Mike. (2008). Exploring the proof paradoxes 'legal theory'. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 2 indexed citations
9.
Redmayne, Mike. (2008). EXPLORING THE PROOF PARADOXES. Legal Theory. 14(4). 281–309. 4 indexed citations
10.
Redmayne, Mike. (2006). The Structure of Evidence Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 26(4). 805–822. 5 indexed citations
11.
Redmayne, Mike. (2005). Rethinking the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 27(2). 209–232. 21 indexed citations
12.
Redmayne, Mike. (2003). Rationality, naturalism and evidence law. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 1 indexed citations
13.
Redmayne, Mike. (2003). Objective probability and the assessment of evidence. Law Probability and Risk. 2(4). 275–294. 13 indexed citations
14.
Redmayne, Mike. (2003). Myths, Relationships and Coincidences: The New Problems of Sexual History. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof. 7(2). 75–101. 11 indexed citations
15.
Redmayne, Mike. (2001). Expert Evidence and Criminal Justice. 64 indexed citations
16.
Redmayne, Mike. (2000). A corroboration approach to recovered memories of sexual abuse: a note of caution. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 2 indexed citations
17.
Wasik, Martin, Thomas Gibbons, & Mike Redmayne. (1999). Criminal justice : text and materials. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 2 indexed citations
18.
Redmayne, Mike. (1997). Presenting Probabilities in Court: The DNA Experience. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof. 1(4). 187–214. 3 indexed citations
19.
Redmayne, Mike. (1997). Process Gains and Process Values: The Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996. Modern Law Review. 60(1). 79–93. 5 indexed citations
20.
Redmayne, Mike. (1996). Science, Evidence and Logic. Modern Law Review. 59(5). 747–760. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026