Hannah Feeney

532 total citations
19 papers, 344 citations indexed

About

Hannah Feeney is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Hannah Feeney has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 344 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 14 papers in Gender Studies and 3 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Hannah Feeney's work include Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (14 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (11 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (5 papers). Hannah Feeney is often cited by papers focused on Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (14 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (11 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (5 papers). Hannah Feeney collaborates with scholars based in United States and Malaysia. Hannah Feeney's co-authors include Rebecca Campbell, Giannina Fehler‐Cabral, Jessica Shaw, Rachael Goodman‐Williams, Steven J. Pierce, Dhruv Sharma, Kevin J. Strom, Marcus Berzofsky, Danielle Chiaramonte and Megan R. Greeson and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Community Psychology, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry and Journal of Interpersonal Violence.

In The Last Decade

Hannah Feeney

17 papers receiving 334 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Hannah Feeney United States 8 223 203 73 45 32 19 344
Amanda Konradi United States 12 270 1.2× 212 1.0× 84 1.2× 92 2.0× 19 0.6× 27 375
Angela Onwuachi-Willig United States 9 87 0.4× 126 0.6× 34 0.5× 18 0.4× 36 1.1× 42 239
Sarah MacQueen United Kingdom 7 64 0.3× 296 1.5× 64 0.9× 15 0.3× 264 8.3× 24 376
Stephen L. Muzzatti Canada 8 31 0.1× 218 1.1× 27 0.4× 15 0.3× 33 1.0× 16 303
Simon Bronitt Australia 10 48 0.2× 159 0.8× 16 0.2× 92 2.0× 115 3.6× 71 301
Dana Cuomo United States 9 95 0.4× 199 1.0× 35 0.5× 32 0.7× 39 1.2× 18 295
Megan Alderden United States 10 253 1.1× 333 1.6× 107 1.5× 32 0.7× 151 4.7× 16 435
Carolina Villacampa Estiarte Spain 10 96 0.4× 307 1.5× 48 0.7× 57 1.3× 32 1.0× 84 373
Sara Salem United Kingdom 6 140 0.6× 161 0.8× 33 0.5× 11 0.2× 43 1.3× 26 274
Amanda Gouws South Africa 10 156 0.7× 133 0.7× 18 0.2× 31 0.7× 25 0.8× 32 265

Countries citing papers authored by Hannah Feeney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah Feeney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah Feeney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah Feeney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah Feeney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah Feeney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah Feeney. The network helps show where Hannah Feeney may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hannah Feeney

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hannah Feeney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hannah Feeney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hannah Feeney. Hannah Feeney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Campbell, Rebecca, Steven J. Pierce, Rachael Goodman‐Williams, & Hannah Feeney. (2022). A window of opportunity: Examining the potential impact of mandatorysexual assault kit (SAK) testing legislation on crimeprevention.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 28(3). 446–458. 4 indexed citations
2.
Shaw, Jessica, et al.. (2022). An evaluation of a rapid conversion to teleSANE in response to COVID‐19. American Journal of Community Psychology. 70(3-4). 458–474. 1 indexed citations
3.
Strom, Kevin J., et al.. (2020). How much justice is denied? An estimate of unsubmitted sexual assault kits in the United States. Journal of Criminal Justice. 73. 101746–101746. 20 indexed citations
4.
Feeney, Hannah, et al.. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on North Carolina's victim service providers.
5.
Campbell, Rebecca, Giannina Fehler‐Cabral, Steven J. Pierce, et al.. (2020). Changing the Criminal Justice System Response to Sexual Assault: An Empirical Study of a Participatory Action Research Project. American Journal of Community Psychology. 67(1-2). 166–178. 7 indexed citations
6.
Strom, Kevin J., et al.. (2020). Estimating Crime Laboratory Efficiency in the Testing of Sexual Assault Kits,. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 65(5). 1497–1506. 1 indexed citations
7.
Campbell, Rebecca, Hannah Feeney, Rachael Goodman‐Williams, Dhruv Sharma, & Steven J. Pierce. (2019). Connecting the dots: Identifying suspected serial sexual offenders through forensic DNA evidence.. Psychology of Violence. 10(3). 255–267. 8 indexed citations
8.
Shaw, Jessica, Hannah Feeney, & Rebecca Campbell. (2019). Never too early to start: Training graduate students for policy work.. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 89(4). 426–433.
9.
Campbell, Rebecca, Steven J. Pierce, Wenjuan Ma, et al.. (2019). Will history repeat itself? Growth mixture modeling of suspected serial sexual offending using forensic DNA evidence. Journal of Criminal Justice. 61. 1–12. 4 indexed citations
10.
Goodman‐Williams, Rachael, Rebecca Campbell, Dhruv Sharma, et al.. (2019). How to Right a Wrong: Empirically Evaluating Whether Victim, Offender, and Assault Characteristics can Inform Rape Kit Testing Policies. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation. 20(3). 288–303. 6 indexed citations
11.
12.
Campbell, Rebecca, Rachael Goodman‐Williams, Hannah Feeney, & Giannina Fehler‐Cabral. (2018). Assessing Triangulation Across Methodologies, Methods, and Stakeholder Groups: The Joys, Woes, and Politics of Interpreting Convergent and Divergent Data. American Journal of Evaluation. 41(1). 125–144. 71 indexed citations
13.
Feeney, Hannah, Danielle Chiaramonte, Rebecca Campbell, Megan R. Greeson, & Giannina Fehler‐Cabral. (2017). Anogenital and Physical Injuries in Adolescent Sexual Assault Patients: The Role of Victim–Offender Relationship, Alcohol Use, and Memory Impairment. Journal of Forensic Nursing. 13(2). 52–61. 4 indexed citations
14.
Shaw, Jessica, et al.. (2016). Beyond surveys and scales: How rape myths manifest in sexual assaultpolice records.. Psychology of Violence. 7(4). 602–614. 99 indexed citations
15.
Campbell, Rebecca, Steven J. Pierce, Dhruv Sharma, Hannah Feeney, & Giannina Fehler‐Cabral. (2016). Developing Empirically Informed Policies for Sexual Assault Kit DNA Testing: Is It Too Late to Test Kits Beyond the Statute of Limitations?. Criminal Justice Policy Review. 30(1). 3–27. 7 indexed citations
16.
Campbell, Rebecca, Hannah Feeney, Steven J. Pierce, Dhruv Sharma, & Giannina Fehler‐Cabral. (2016). Tested at Last: How DNA Evidence in Untested Rape Kits Can Identify Offenders and Serial Sexual Assaults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 33(24). 3792–3814. 19 indexed citations
17.
Campbell, Rebecca, Steven J. Pierce, Dhruv Sharma, Hannah Feeney, & Giannina Fehler‐Cabral. (2016). Should Rape Kit Testing Be Prioritized by Victim–Offender Relationship?. Criminology & Public Policy. 15(2). 555–583. 22 indexed citations
18.
Campbell, Rebecca, Steven J. Pierce, Dhruv Sharma, et al.. (2016). Comparing Standard and Selective DegradationDNAExtraction Methods: Results from a Field Experiment with Sexual Assault Kits,. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 62(1). 213–222. 5 indexed citations
19.
Campbell, Rebecca, et al.. (2015). The National Problem of Untested Sexual Assault Kits (SAKs): Scope, Causes, and Future Directions for Research, Policy, and Practice. Trauma Violence & Abuse. 18(4). 363–376. 58 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Amanda Konradi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Angela Onwuachi-Willig Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sarah MacQueen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stephen L. Muzzatti Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Simon Bronitt Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dana Cuomo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Megan Alderden Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Carolina Villacampa Estiarte Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sara Salem Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Amanda Gouws
Rankless by CCL
2026