This map shows the geographic impact of Joost Breuker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joost Breuker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joost Breuker more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joost Breuker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joost Breuker. The network helps show where Joost Breuker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joost Breuker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joost Breuker.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joost Breuker based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Joost Breuker. Joost Breuker is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Breuker, Joost, et al.. (2005). Conceptual and Organisational Framework for Conversational and Collaboration Processes. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).
2.
Breuker, Joost, et al.. (2000). Knowledgeable information brokering. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).3 indexed citations
Bredeweg, Bert, et al.. (1997). Constructing aggregated reasoning networks for coaching qualitative prediction of behaviour. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).
7.
Koning, K. de, Bert Bredeweg, & Joost Breuker. (1997). Automatic aggregation of qualitative reasoning networks. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 77–88.1 indexed citations
8.
Valente, André & Joost Breuker. (1995). ON-LINE. 307–315.14 indexed citations
9.
Breuker, Joost & André Valente. (1994). A Commonsense Formalization of Normative Systems.. International Conference on Lightning Protection.5 indexed citations
10.
Breuker, Joost & Walter Van de Velde. (1994). CommonKADS Library for Expertise Modelling: reusable problem solving components. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).76 indexed citations
11.
Schreiber, Guus, Bob Wielinga, & Joost Breuker. (1993). KADS : a principled approach to knowledge-based system development. Academic Press eBooks.187 indexed citations
Breuker, Joost, et al.. (1989). Artificial intelligence and education : proceedings of the 4th International Conference on AI and Education, 24-26 May 1989, Amsterdam, Netherlands.1 indexed citations
15.
Sandberg, Jacobijn, Joost Breuker, & Radboud Winkels. (1988). Research on HELP-Systems: Empirical Study and Model Construction.. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 106–111.4 indexed citations
16.
Breuker, Joost, et al.. (1988). StatCons: knowledge acquisition in a complex domain. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 100–105.2 indexed citations
17.
Breuker, Joost, Radboud Winkels, & Jacobijn Sandberg. (1987). A shell for intelligent help systems. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 167–173.13 indexed citations
18.
Wielinga, Bob & Joost Breuker. (1986). Models of expertise. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 497–509.56 indexed citations
19.
Breuker, Joost, et al.. (1985). A case study in structured knowledge acquisition. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 390–392.15 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.