Countries citing papers authored by Alexander Boer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander Boer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander Boer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander Boer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander Boer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander Boer. The network helps show where Alexander Boer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alexander Boer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alexander Boer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alexander Boer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Alexander Boer. Alexander Boer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Winkels, Radboud & Alexander Boer. (2014). Finding and Visualizing Dutch Legislative Context Networks. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 3. 157–182.2 indexed citations
4.
Boer, Alexander. (2011). Continental Drift: Contextualizing Citizens United by Comparing the Diverging British and American Approaches to Political Advertising. Boston College international and comparative law review. 34(1). 91.
5.
Boer, Alexander, et al.. (2011). A problem solving model for regulatory policy making. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).1 indexed citations
Boer, Alexander, Radboud Winkels, & Fabio Vitali. (2008). MetaLex XML and the legal knowledge interchange format.16 indexed citations
8.
Boer, Alexander, Radboud Winkels, & Fabio Vitali. (2007). Proposed XML Standards for Law: MetaLex and LKIF. Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna). 19–28.10 indexed citations
9.
Breuker, Joost, et al.. (2006). Developing Content for LKIF: Ontologies and Frameworks for Legal Reasoning. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 152. 169–174.16 indexed citations
10.
Boer, Alexander, Tom van Engers, & Radboud Winkels. (2005). Mixing Legal and Non-legal Norms. 25–36.9 indexed citations
11.
Winkels, Radboud, T.M. van Engers, & Alexander Boer. (2005). Normative statements on the semantic web.. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 99–112.4 indexed citations
12.
Winkels, Radboud, T.M. van Engers, & Alexander Boer. (2004). Internet, portal to justice?. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 120. 131–140.3 indexed citations
13.
Boer, Alexander, Radboud Winkels, Rinke Hoekstra, & T.M. van Engers. (2003). Knowledge Management for Legislative Drafting in an International Setting. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 91–100.6 indexed citations
14.
Boer, Alexander, Rinke Hoekstra, Radboud Winkels, & T.M. van Engers. (2002). METAlex: Legislation in XML. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 1–10.33 indexed citations
15.
Winkels, Radboud, Alexander Boer, & Rinke Hoekstra. (2002). CLIME: lessons learned in legal information serving. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 230–234.18 indexed citations
16.
Winkels, Radboud, et al.. (2000). Extended conceptual retrieval. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 85–88.13 indexed citations
Winkels, Radboud, Joost Breuker, & Alexander Boer. (1999). Intelligent information serving for the legal practitioner. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 103–114.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.