Countries where authors publish in Journal of Asian Natural Products Research
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Asian Natural Products Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Asian Natural Products Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Asian Natural Products Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Asian Natural Products Research
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Asian Natural Products Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Asian Natural Products Research.
About Journal of Asian Natural Products Research
The 3.2k papers published in Journal of Asian Natural Products Research in the last decades have received a total of 36.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Asian Natural Products Research usually cover Pharmacology (434 papers), Pharmacology (802 papers) and Biochemistry (300 papers) specifically the topics of Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (1.2k papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (822 papers) and Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (330 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Asian Natural Products Research are Xiu‐Wei Yang, Ruo-Yun Chen, Guanhua Du, De‐Quan Yu, Xin‐Sheng Yao, Jian‐Gong Shi, R. N. Yadava, Xin‐Sheng Yao, Xian Li and Ji‐Kai Liu.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.