Countries citing papers authored by Radboud Winkels
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Radboud Winkels's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Radboud Winkels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Radboud Winkels more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Radboud Winkels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Radboud Winkels. The network helps show where Radboud Winkels may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Radboud Winkels
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Radboud Winkels.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Radboud Winkels based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Radboud Winkels. Radboud Winkels is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Winkels, Radboud. (2010). Legal knowledge and information systems: JURIX 2010, the twenty-third annual conference. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).3 indexed citations
3.
Winkels, Radboud, et al.. (2010). Suggesting Model Fragments for Sentences in Dutch Laws. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 605. 19–28.4 indexed citations
Boer, Alexander, Radboud Winkels, & Fabio Vitali. (2008). MetaLex XML and the legal knowledge interchange format.16 indexed citations
6.
Winkels, Radboud, et al.. (2007). Categorisation of Norms. 79–88.5 indexed citations
7.
Boer, Alexander, Radboud Winkels, & Fabio Vitali. (2007). Proposed XML Standards for Law: MetaLex and LKIF. Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna). 19–28.10 indexed citations
8.
Boer, Alexander, Tom van Engers, & Radboud Winkels. (2005). Mixing Legal and Non-legal Norms. 25–36.9 indexed citations
9.
Winkels, Radboud, et al.. (2004). Internet toegangspoort tot het recht?. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).1 indexed citations
10.
Winkels, Radboud, T.M. van Engers, & Alexander Boer. (2004). Internet, portal to justice?. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 120. 131–140.3 indexed citations
11.
Boer, Alexander, Rinke Hoekstra, Radboud Winkels, & T.M. van Engers. (2002). METAlex: Legislation in XML. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 1–10.33 indexed citations
12.
Winkels, Radboud, Alexander Boer, & Rinke Hoekstra. (2002). CLIME: lessons learned in legal information serving. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 230–234.18 indexed citations
13.
Breuker, Joost, Ronald Leenes, & Radboud Winkels. (2000). Legal knowledge and information systems : JURIX 2000 : the thirteenth annual conference. IOS Press eBooks.2 indexed citations
14.
Winkels, Radboud, et al.. (2000). Extended conceptual retrieval. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 85–88.13 indexed citations
Winkels, Radboud. (1992). Explorations in Intelligent Tutoring and Help. Medical Entomology and Zoology.39 indexed citations
19.
Sandberg, Jacobijn, Joost Breuker, & Radboud Winkels. (1988). Research on HELP-Systems: Empirical Study and Model Construction.. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 106–111.4 indexed citations
20.
Breuker, Joost, Radboud Winkels, & Jacobijn Sandberg. (1987). A shell for intelligent help systems. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 167–173.13 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.