Jones Ch

423 total citations
32 papers, 187 citations indexed

About

Jones Ch is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Jones Ch has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 187 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in General Health Professions, 9 papers in Clinical Psychology and 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Jones Ch's work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (7 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (5 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers). Jones Ch is often cited by papers focused on Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (7 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (5 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers). Jones Ch collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and Australia. Jones Ch's co-authors include Gill Windle, Bob Woods, Peter M. van de Ven, Karlijn J. Joling, Andrew Newman, Judy Hutchings, Mihela Erjavec, Jennifer Roberts, Martina Roes and Emilie Brotherhood and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Journal of Rural Studies.

In The Last Decade

Jones Ch

27 papers receiving 174 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jones Ch United Kingdom	6	62	60	53	50	33	32	187
Alison Ledger United Kingdom	10	55 0.9×	63 1.1×	40 0.8×	28 0.6×	23 0.7×	24	256
Patricia Fenner Australia	9	74 1.2×	30 0.5×	206 3.9×	103 2.1×	73 2.2×	21	302
Katey Warran United Kingdom	9	29 0.5×	22 0.4×	48 0.9×	30 0.6×	30 0.9×	19	172
Anne Cronin Mosey United States	10	51 0.8×	115 1.9×	7 0.1×	80 1.6×	26 0.8×	16	367
Tríona McCaffrey Ireland	8	36 0.6×	33 0.6×	78 1.5×	32 0.6×	13 0.4×	23	228
Mike White United Kingdom	7	46 0.7×	78 1.3×	192 3.6×	13 0.3×	82 2.5×	19	276
Carolien Lamers United Kingdom	6	116 1.9×	61 1.0×	6 0.1×	177 3.5×	22 0.7×	11	280
Bani Malhotra United States	6	17 0.3×	15 0.3×	123 2.3×	69 1.4×	20 0.6×	20	203
Karen Price United Kingdom	9	17 0.3×	24 0.4×	23 0.4×	164 3.3×	77 2.3×	19	239
Naomi Feil Serbia	7	89 1.4×	124 2.1×	7 0.1×	61 1.2×	52 1.6×	11	245

Countries citing papers authored by Jones Ch

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jones Ch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jones Ch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jones Ch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jones Ch

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jones Ch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jones Ch. The network helps show where Jones Ch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jones Ch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jones Ch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jones Ch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jones Ch. Jones Ch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Roberts, Jennifer, et al.. (2025). Experiences of dementia in farming communities: A scoping review. Journal of Rural Studies. 119. 103710–103710.

Martin, Steven S. & Jones Ch. (2025). A scoping review of how people living with dementia perceive and use assistive technology to support everyday activities in their homes. Worcester Research and Publications (University of Worcester). 4(1).

Roberts, Jennifer, et al.. (2023). Knowledge Is Power: Utilizing Human-Centered Design Principles with People Living with Dementia to Co-Design a Resource and Share Knowledge with Peers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 20(20). 6937–6937. 1 indexed citations

Windle, Gill, Jennifer Roberts, Catherine Macleod, et al.. (2023). ‘I have never bounced back’: resilience and living with dementia. Aging & Mental Health. 27(12). 2355–2367. 11 indexed citations

Ch, Jones, et al.. (2022). A qualitative systematic review of the role of families in supporting communication in people with dementia. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 57(5). 1130–1153. 11 indexed citations

Roes, Martina, Carolien Smits, Aud Johannessen, et al.. (2022). Intersectionality and its relevance for research in dementia care of people with a migration background. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie. 55(4). 287–291. 8 indexed citations

Woods, Bob, et al.. (2019). A Collaborative Approach: Care Staff and Families Working Together to Safeguard the Quality of Life of Residents Living With Advanced Dementia. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 11. 3701670432–3701670432. 7 indexed citations

Woods, Bob, et al.. (2019). Understanding quality of life and well-being for people living with advanced dementia. Nursing Older People. 31(2). 18–24. 4 indexed citations

Ch, Jones, et al.. (2019). CareShare: An intergenerational programme for people with dementia and nursery children. Worcester Research and Publications (University of Worcester). 1(145). 33–37. 1 indexed citations

10.

Tischler, Victoria, et al.. (2019). Using art for public engagement: reflections on the Dementia and Imagination project. Arts & Health. 12(3). 270–277. 4 indexed citations

11.

Windle, Gill, Karlijn J. Joling, Bob Woods, et al.. (2017). The impact of a visual arts program on quality of life, communication, and well-being of people living with dementia: a mixed-methods longitudinal investigation. International Psychogeriatrics. 30(3). 409–423. 71 indexed citations

12.

Moyle, Wendy, Elizabeth Beattie, Brian Draper, et al.. (2017). A SOCIAL ROBOT CALLED PARO AND ITS EFFECT ON PEOPLE LIVING WITH DEMENTIA. Innovation in Aging. 1(suppl_1). 344–344. 1 indexed citations

13.

Ch, Jones, et al.. (2016). Outcomes of a Comparison Study into a Group-Based Infant Parenting Programme. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 25(11). 3309–3321. 21 indexed citations

14.

Ch, Jones, et al.. (2012). Parent and group leader reflections on a group-based programme for parents and babies.. PubMed. 85(11). 26–9. 4 indexed citations

15.

Ch, Jones. (1998). Analeptic action of peripheral electrical stimulation in hypoglycemic coma.. PubMed. 1. 50–3. 1 indexed citations

16.

Ch, Jones. (1975). Thermal patterns of the healthy female breast. Physical and physiological considerations.. PubMed. 57–64. 1 indexed citations

17.

Ch, Jones. (1972). A systems approach to psychiatric utilization review.. PubMed. 71(4). 288–91. 1 indexed citations

18.

Ch, Jones, et al.. (1957). Theoretical considerations in the therapeutic use of peripheral electrical stimulation in psychiatry.. PubMed. 18(9). 342–5. 1 indexed citations

19.

Ch, Jones. (1956). The Funkenstein test in selecting methods of psychiatric treatment.. PubMed. 17(2). 37–43. 5 indexed citations

20.

Ch, Jones, et al.. (1952). High energy phosphates in the muscles of depressed and fatigued patients.. PubMed. 60(7). 327–30. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact