Joshua Stott
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Aimee SpectorGeorgina CharlesworthChris BarkerRob SaundersKatrina SciorStephen PillingAmber JohnJohanna C. Goll
- Topics
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (66 papers)Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (21 papers)Mental Health Treatment and Access (18 papers)
- Cited by
- Neuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyPsychiatry and Mental healthClinical Psychology
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Joshua Stott
135 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Psychiatry and Mental health 859
- Clinical Psychology 789
- General Health Professions 606
- Cognitive Neuroscience 453
- Sociology and Political Science 328
Countries citing papers authored by Joshua Stott
This map shows the geographic impact of Joshua Stott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joshua Stott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joshua Stott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joshua Stott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joshua Stott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joshua Stott. The network helps show where Joshua Stott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joshua Stott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joshua Stott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joshua Stott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joshua Stott. Joshua Stott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | Delivering Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST) Virtually: Developing and Field-Testing a New Framework | 17 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 38 | |
| 19 | 25 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Joshua Stott
Joshua Stott is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 151 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (66 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (21 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (101 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (859 citations) and Clinical Psychology (789 citations). Joshua Stott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Aimee Spector, Georgina Charlesworth, Chris Barker, Rob Saunders, Katrina Scior, Stephen Pilling, Amber John, Johanna C. Goll, Joshua E. J. Buckman and Roopal Desai. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.