International Psychogeriatrics

3.7k papers and 106.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.7k papers published in International Psychogeriatrics in the last decades have received a total of 106.4k indexed citations. Papers published in International Psychogeriatrics usually cover Psychiatry and Mental health (1.9k papers), General Health Professions (882 papers) and Clinical Psychology (755 papers) specifically the topics of Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1.6k papers), Health disparities and outcomes (502 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (471 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Psychogeriatrics are John C. Morris, ‌Barry Reisberg, Henry Brodaty, Jiska Cohen‐Mansfield, Anthony F. Jorm, Liat Ayalon, Raymond Levy, Osvaldo P. Almeida, Martin Orrell and Gill Livingston.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in International Psychogeriatrics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Psychogeriatrics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Psychogeriatrics.

Countries where authors publish in International Psychogeriatrics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Psychogeriatrics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Psychogeriatrics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Psychogeriatrics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025