Dave O’Brien

98 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Hit Papers

Culture is bad for you 2020 · 120 citations
12020202026202220244080120

Peers

Dave O’Brien
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Urban Studies 806
  • Music 105
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 150
  • Museology 91
  • Conservation 71
Replace Eleonora Belfiore with:
Eleonora Belfiore United Kingdom
Arthur C. Brooks United States
Alan McKinlay United Kingdom
Kate Oakley United Kingdom
Catherine Porter United Kingdom
Philo C. Wasburn United States
Elizabeth Vallance United States
Teresa Rees United Kingdom
Johan Heilbron France
Kate Nash United Kingdom
Dave O’Brien relative to Eleonora Belfiore United Kingdom Eleonora Belfiore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Eleonora Belfiore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dave O’Brien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dave O’Brien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dave O’Brien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dave O’Brien more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dave O’Brien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dave O’Brien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dave O’Brien. The network helps show where Dave O’Brien may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dave O’Brien, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dave O’Brien Line = papers co-authored together Dave O’Brien links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 112 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Culture is bad for you
Hit paper breakdown →
2020120
2 2016114
3 201888
4 201686
5 198784
6
Measuring the value of culture: a report to the Department for Culture Media and Sport
201062
7 201455
8 202152
9 201350
10 201649
11 201748
12 201639
13 201837
14 201737
15 201737
16 201733
17 201231
18
Cultural Value and Inequality: A Critical Literature Review
201531
19 199926
20 201426

About Dave O’Brien

Dave O’Brien is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Law and Philosophy, having authored 112 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Industries and Urban Development (45 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (27 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (11 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (10 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (8 papers), Law, Rights, and Freedoms (7 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (7 papers) and Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (806 citations), Music (105 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (150 citations), Museology (91 citations) and Conservation (71 citations). Dave O’Brien has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mark Taylor, Sam Friedman, Daniel Laurison, Orian Brook, Kate Oakley, Andrew Miles, Samuel R. Friedman, Peter Campbell, Ian R. McDonald and Gill Windle. Their work appears in journals such as Cultural Trends, Sociology, Journal of Cultural Economy, The Journal of Hellenic Studies and Journal of Policy Research in Tourism Leisure and Events.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact