Quality in Ageing and Older Adults

452 papers and 3.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 452 papers published in Quality in Ageing and Older Adults in the last decades have received a total of 3.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Quality in Ageing and Older Adults usually cover General Health Professions (229 papers), Demography (126 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (111 papers) specifically the topics of Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (137 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (79 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (75 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quality in Ageing and Older Adults are Charles Musselwhite, Hebba Haddad, Win Tadd, Judith Torrington, Arlene Astell, Mike Nolan, Anthea Tinker, Lynne Mitchell, Elizabeth Burton and Toby O. Smith.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Quality in Ageing and Older Adults

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Quality in Ageing and Older Adults. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quality in Ageing and Older Adults.

Countries where authors publish in Quality in Ageing and Older Adults

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quality in Ageing and Older Adults. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quality in Ageing and Older Adults with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quality in Ageing and Older Adults more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025