Julia Haberstroh

588 total citations
59 papers, 359 citations indexed

About

Julia Haberstroh is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Julia Haberstroh has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 359 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in General Health Professions, 29 papers in Clinical Psychology and 18 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Julia Haberstroh's work include Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (20 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (14 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (10 papers). Julia Haberstroh is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (20 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (14 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (10 papers). Julia Haberstroh collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Julia Haberstroh's co-authors include Johannes Pantel, Frank Oswald, Bernhard Schmitz, Tanja R. Müller, Roman Kaspar, M. Weber, Johannes Schröder, Monika Knopf, Jochen René Thyrian and Franziska Perels and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and BMJ Open.

In The Last Decade

Julia Haberstroh

50 papers receiving 340 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Julia Haberstroh Germany 11 217 138 134 102 49 59 359
Graham Stokes United Kingdom 7 123 0.6× 141 1.0× 74 0.6× 40 0.4× 20 0.4× 10 229
Errollyn Bruce United Kingdom 8 167 0.8× 232 1.7× 71 0.5× 48 0.5× 27 0.6× 9 389
Ellen Tullo United Kingdom 10 119 0.5× 92 0.7× 39 0.3× 75 0.7× 33 0.7× 28 287
Deborah Brooks Australia 10 183 0.8× 139 1.0× 58 0.4× 88 0.9× 8 0.2× 28 296
Gill Pinner United Kingdom 8 124 0.6× 134 1.0× 48 0.4× 111 1.1× 46 0.9× 8 288
Astrid Vellinga Netherlands 6 143 0.7× 145 1.1× 166 1.2× 36 0.4× 60 1.2× 16 297
Ayşegül Dirik United Kingdom 5 107 0.5× 97 0.7× 247 1.8× 58 0.6× 77 1.6× 10 297
Laurie Curtis United States 9 348 1.6× 106 0.8× 195 1.5× 32 0.3× 103 2.1× 11 458
Tuula Wallsten Sweden 12 96 0.4× 98 0.7× 335 2.5× 43 0.4× 77 1.6× 18 411
Bill Fulford United Kingdom 10 122 0.6× 52 0.4× 95 0.7× 48 0.5× 14 0.3× 29 248

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Haberstroh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Haberstroh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Haberstroh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Haberstroh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Haberstroh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Haberstroh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Haberstroh. The network helps show where Julia Haberstroh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia Haberstroh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia Haberstroh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia Haberstroh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia Haberstroh. Julia Haberstroh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Appelbaum, Paul S., et al.. (2025). Development and validation of the CAT-AD: a competence assessment tool for advance directives. Ethik in der Medizin. 37(4). 567–583.
2.
Abele, Christina, et al.. (2025). Advance directives in German memory clinics. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie. 58(8). 681–687.
3.
Abele, Christina, et al.. (2024). Do Mental Health Professionals Recognize Dementia Grief?. GeroPsych. 38(1). 11–22.
4.
Thyrian, Jochen René, et al.. (2024). Implementing Dementia Care Management into routine care: protocol for a cohort study in Siegen-Wittgenstein, Germany (RoutineDeCM). BMJ Open. 14(6). e085852–e085852. 1 indexed citations
5.
Haberstroh, Julia, et al.. (2024). Facing the new diagnostic and treatment options of Alzheimer's disease: The necessity of informed consent. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 21(1). e14204–e14204. 3 indexed citations
6.
7.
Haberstroh, Julia, et al.. (2023). Reducing Dementia Grief Through Psychosocial Interventions. European Psychologist. 28(2). 83–94. 8 indexed citations
8.
Haberstroh, Julia, et al.. (2023). Implementation of dementia care management in routine care (RoutineDeCM): a study protocol for process evaluation. BMJ Open. 13(8). e072185–e072185. 4 indexed citations
9.
Baisch, Stefanie, et al.. (2023). The Role of Different Aspects of Communication Behavior in the Assessment of Capacity to Consent. GeroPsych. 36(4). 227–235.
10.
Haberstroh, Julia, et al.. (2022). Adapting a Dementia Care Management Intervention for Regional Implementation: A Theory-Based Participatory Barrier Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(9). 5478–5478. 9 indexed citations
11.
Baisch, Stefanie, Christina Abele, Irene Schmidtmann, et al.. (2022). Project DECIDE, part 1: increasing the amount of valid advance directives in people with Alzheimer’s disease by offering advance care planning—a prospective double-arm intervention study. BMC Medical Ethics. 23(1). 132–132. 4 indexed citations
12.
Haberstroh, Julia, Valentina A. Tesky, & Johannes Pantel. (2021). Einwilligungsfähigkeit von Menschen mit Demenz. Der Nervenarzt. 92(7). 721–728.
13.
Haberstroh, Julia, Jakov Gather, Tarik Karakaya, et al.. (2021). Supported Decision-Making in Persons With Dementia: Development of an Enhanced Consent Procedure for Lumbar Puncture. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 12. 780276–780276. 8 indexed citations
14.
Pantel, Johannes, et al.. (2020). How do dementia researchers view support tools for informed consent procedures of persons with dementia?. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie. 54(7). 667–675. 4 indexed citations
15.
Wahl, Hans‐Werner, et al.. (2019). Communication behavior of cognitively impaired older inpatients. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie. 52(S4). 264–272. 3 indexed citations
16.
Haberstroh, Julia, Frank Oswald, Roman Kaspar, et al.. (2016). Assessing capacity to consent to treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors in dementia using a specific and standardized version of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool (MacCAT-T). International Psychogeriatrics. 29(2). 333–343. 9 indexed citations
17.
Haberstroh, Julia, et al.. (2016). Train the trainer in dementia care. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie. 49(3). 209–215. 19 indexed citations
18.
Haberstroh, Julia, et al.. (2015). CODEMamb– an observational communication behavior assessment tool for use in ambulatory dementia care. Aging & Mental Health. 20(12). 1286–1296. 11 indexed citations
19.
Haberstroh, Julia, et al.. (2013). Need for and Challenges Facing Functional Communication as Outcome Parameter in AD Clinical Trials. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders. 27(4). 293–301. 6 indexed citations
20.
Perels, Franziska, et al.. (2006). Hausaufgabenverhalten aus der Perspektive der Selbstregulation. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie. 38(4). 175–185. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Graham Stokes Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Errollyn Bruce Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ellen Tullo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Deborah Brooks Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gill Pinner Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Astrid Vellinga Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ayşegül Dirik Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Laurie Curtis Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tuula Wallsten Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bill Fulford
Rankless by CCL
2026