Mark Bould
- Philosophy top 2%
- Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction 13
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Gothic Literature and Media Analysis 3
-
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism 4
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 10%
- General Arts and Humanities top 10%
-
- Digital Games and Media 7
- Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies 1
- Australian History and Society 1
-
- Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life 4
-
- Cinema and Media Studies 3
Mark Bould
23 papers receiving 144 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Philosophy 112
- Cultural Studies 76
- Literature and Literary Theory 75
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 19
- General Arts and Humanities 3
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Bould
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Bould's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Bould with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Bould more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Bould
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Bould. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Bould. The network helps show where Mark Bould may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Mark Bould, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 5 | African science fiction 101 | 2015 | 8 |
| 6 | Book review: If colonialism was the apocalypse, what happens next? On Nerine Dorman, ed., 'Terra Incognita: New Short Speculative Stories from Africa' and Dilman Dila, 'A Killing in the Sun’ | 2015 | 1 |
| 7 | From anti-colonial struggle to neoliberal immiseration: Mohammed Dib’s Who Remembers the Sea, Sony Labou Tansi’s Life and a Half and Ahmed Khaled Towfik’s Utopia | 2014 | 2 |
| 8 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 9 | The pleasures of science fiction; or, some things I did the other day | 2013 | 1 |
| 10 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 12 | The Cinema of John Sayles: Lone Star | 2009 | 0 |
| 13 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 34 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 61 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2002 | 13 |
About Mark Bould
Mark Bould is a scholar working on Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory, Cultural Studies, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 31 papers that have together received 236 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (13 papers), Digital Games and Media (7 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (4 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (4 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (3 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (3 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (1 paper) and Australian History and Society (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (112 citations), Cultural Studies (76 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (75 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (19 citations) and General Arts and Humanities (3 citations). Mark Bould has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Sherryl Vint, Andrew M. Butler, Adam Roberts, Helen Merrick, Edward James, Damien Broderick, Brian Stableford, István Csicsery‐Rónay, Farah Mendlesohn and Brian Attebery. Their work appears in journals such as Science Fiction Studies, Extrapolation, Historical Materialism, Biography and Screen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.