Studies in Romanticism

1.5k papers and 10.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Studies in Romanticism in the last decades have received a total of 10.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Studies in Romanticism usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (552 papers), History (153 papers) and Philosophy (130 papers) specifically the topics of Literature: history, themes, analysis (134 papers), Moravian Church and William Blake (99 papers) and Historical and Literary Studies (65 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies in Romanticism are Michael McKeon, Raymond Williams, Anne K. Mellor, Sandra M. Gilbert, Julia Prewitt Brown, Susan Gubar, Anne Janowitz, Harold Bloom, Jerome McGann and Deidre Lynch.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studies in Romanticism

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies in Romanticism. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies in Romanticism.

Countries where authors publish in Studies in Romanticism

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies in Romanticism. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies in Romanticism with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies in Romanticism more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025