This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biography. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biography with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biography more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Biography. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biography.
About Biography
The 910 papers published in Biography in the last decades have received a total of 2.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Biography usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (269 papers), History (176 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (71 papers), Cultural Studies (83 papers) and Philosophy (109 papers) specifically the topics of Autobiographical and Biographical Writing (94 papers), Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis (40 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (38 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (36 papers), Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (34 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (33 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (31 papers) and Philosophy, History, and Historiography (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biography are Laurie S. McNeill, Leigh Gilmore, Gillian Whitlock, Julie Rak, Julia Watson, Allen Feldman, Sidonie Smith, Anna Poletti, Paul John Eakin and Madeleine Sorapure.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.