John Mitchell O’Toole
- Education top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Language and Linguistics top 5%
- Information Systems
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Joshua MatthewsGholamreza AminianMeng Huat ChauChen ShenRuth ReynoldsSid BourkeMike KeppellAfsoon Hassani Mehraban
- Topics
- Online and Blended Learning (6 papers)Science Education and Pedagogy (6 papers)Second Language Acquisition and Learning (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaChinaSaudi Arabia
In The Last Decade
John Mitchell O’Toole
30 papers receiving 318 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Education 212
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 88
- Language and Linguistics 64
- Information Systems 40
- Sociology and Political Science 39
Countries citing papers authored by John Mitchell O’Toole
This map shows the geographic impact of John Mitchell O’Toole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Mitchell O’Toole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Mitchell O’Toole more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Mitchell O’Toole
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Mitchell O’Toole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Mitchell O’Toole. The network helps show where John Mitchell O’Toole may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Mitchell O’Toole
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Mitchell O’Toole. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Mitchell O’Toole based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Mitchell O’Toole. John Mitchell O’Toole is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | A preliminary study of the technical use of Arabic in Saudi secondary physics classes | 2 |
| 6 | 29 | |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | The attitudes of teacher educators to the use of problem based learning: The video triggers approach | 3 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About John Mitchell O’Toole
John Mitchell O’Toole is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 35 papers that have together received 372 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (6 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (6 papers) and Second Language Acquisition and Learning (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (212 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (88 citations) and Language and Linguistics (64 citations). John Mitchell O’Toole has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, China and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Joshua Matthews, Gholamreza Aminian, Meng Huat Chau, Chen Shen, Ruth Reynolds, Sid Bourke, Mike Keppell, Afsoon Hassani Mehraban, Jean Harkins and Brian Duckworth. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, The Journal of Educational Research and Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.