Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of John Lidstone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Lidstone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Lidstone more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Lidstone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Lidstone. The network helps show where John Lidstone may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Lidstone
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Lidstone.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Lidstone based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Lidstone. John Lidstone is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bourke, Terri, John Lidstone, & Mary Ryan. (2015). Schooling teachers: Professionalism or disciplinary power?. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).1 indexed citations
Lidstone, John. (2006). Cultural issues of our time. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).2 indexed citations
9.
Lidstone, John. (2006). Blazer to the Rescue! The Role of Puppetry in Enhancing Fire Prevention and Preparedness for Young Children. Australian Journal of Emergency Management. 21(2). 17.
Lidstone, John, et al.. (1998). Field work in geography: The essence of the enterprise. interactions. 26(2). 11–14.1 indexed citations
12.
Lidstone, John, et al.. (1998). Public Education and Disaster Management: Is There Any Guiding Theory?. Australian Journal of Emergency Management. 13(3). 14.17 indexed citations
13.
Lidstone, John, et al.. (1998). Public education and disaster management: Is there any guiding theory?. Faculty of Education.4 indexed citations
14.
Lidstone, John & Keith B. Lucas. (1998). Teaching and learning research methodology from interactive multimedia programs: postgraduate students' engagement with an innovative program. 7(2). 237–261.11 indexed citations
15.
Lidstone, John, et al.. (1996). Developments and directions in geographical education. Channel View Publications eBooks.10 indexed citations
16.
Lidstone, John, et al.. (1995). Preparing for the Twenty-First Century: Geography Education in Australia.. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 10(2). 27–41.1 indexed citations
17.
Lidstone, John. (1995). Geography, Environmental Education and Disaster Mitigation: Great Expectations. Australian Journal of Emergency Management. 10(4). 33.1 indexed citations
18.
Lidstone, John. (1995). Global issues of our time. Cambridge University Press eBooks.3 indexed citations
19.
Graves, Norman, et al.. (1987). People and environment : a world perspective.1 indexed citations
20.
Lidstone, John, et al.. (1966). Puppet making through the grades.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.