John Goldie

2.4k citations
27 papers · 1.5k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

John Goldie

27 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Hit Papers

Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age? 2016 · 342 citations
3422016202620192022100200300

Peers

John Goldie
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Family Practice 246
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 962
  • General Health Professions 643
  • Research and Theory 19
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 317
Replace Manuel João Costa with:
Manuel João Costa Portugal
Willem S. de Grave Netherlands
Sandra Jarvis-Selinger Canada
Casey White United States
Willem de Grave Netherlands
Janke Cohen‐Schotanus Netherlands
Nancy Adams United States
Deirdre Bennett Ireland
Esther Helmich Netherlands
Mariana G. Hewson United States
John Goldie relative to Manuel João Costa Portugal Manuel João Costa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Manuel João Costa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Goldie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Goldie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Goldie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Goldie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Goldie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Goldie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Goldie. The network helps show where John Goldie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside John Goldie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Goldie Line = papers co-authored together John Goldie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 201544
3 20141
4 20141
5 20132
6 201212
7 20123
8 2007120
9 200672
10 20057
11 20044
12 200413
13 200444
14 200417
15 200361
16 200284
17 200160
18 20015
19 200056
20 2000160

About John Goldie

John Goldie is a scholar working on Family Practice, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Anatomy, General Health Professions and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (21 papers), Ethics in medical practice (10 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (9 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (7 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (4 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (3 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (246 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (962 citations), General Health Professions (643 citations), Research and Theory (19 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (317 citations). John Goldie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jillian Morrison, Lisa Schwartz, Alex McConnachie, Phil Cotton, Al Dowie, Jill Morrison, Brian Jolly, Kevin W. Eva, Lynne Lohfeld and Geoff Norman. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Education, Medical Teacher, British Journal of General Practice, Journal of Medical Ethics and Seminars in Cancer Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026