John E. Toews
- History top 0.5%
- Philosophy, History, and Historiography 2
- European Political History Analysis 1
- Philosophy top 2%
- General Psychology top 10%
-
- Musicology and Musical Analysis 2
-
- Historical Influence and Diplomacy 2
- Historical Economic and Legal Thought 1
- Historical Legal Studies and Society 1
-
- Christian Theology and Mission 1
-
- Political Economy and Marxism 1
- Co-authors
- Dominick LaCapraMark PosterMargaret RoseBernd MagnusAllan MegillDavid A. HollingerMartin JayPeter Jelavich
- Cited by
- HistoryPhilosophyGeneral Psychology
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (10 papers)History and Theory (3 papers)The Journal of Modern History (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
John E. Toews
27 papers receiving 423 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- History 156
- Philosophy 127
- General Psychology 12
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 43
- Literature and Literary Theory 92
Countries citing papers authored by John E. Toews
This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Toews's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Toews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Toews more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Toews
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Toews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Toews. The network helps show where John E. Toews may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Toews, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 5 | The Communist manifesto : with related documents | 1999 | 5 |
| 6 | 1998 | 8 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1997 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 37 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1991 | 9 | |
| 13 | 1991 | 86 | |
| 14 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1989 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1989 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1988 | 7 | |
| 18 | 1987 | 71 | |
| 19 | 1986 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1981 | 4 |
About John E. Toews
John E. Toews is a scholar working on General Psychology, Music, History, General Social Sciences and Cultural Studies, having authored 28 papers that have together received 713 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musicology and Musical Analysis (2 papers), Philosophy, History, and Historiography (2 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (2 papers), Historical Economic and Legal Thought (1 paper), Historical Legal Studies and Society (1 paper), Christian Theology and Mission (1 paper), European Political History Analysis (1 paper) and Political Economy and Marxism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (156 citations), Philosophy (127 citations), General Psychology (12 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (43 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (92 citations). John E. Toews has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dominick LaCapra, Mark Poster, Margaret Rose, Bernd Magnus, Allan Megill, David A. Hollinger, Martin Jay, Peter Jelavich, J. B. Schneewind and Guenther Roth. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, History and Theory, The Journal of Modern History, Modern Intellectual History and Semiotica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.